Analyze production code diffs to identify test coverage gaps.
npx skills add https://github.com/T-rav/hydraflow --skill hf-test-adequacy
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: hf.test-adequacy Source: https://github.com/T-rav/hydraflow/tree/main/.codex/skills/hf.test-adequacy Command: npx skills add https://github.com/T-rav/hydraflow --skill hf-test-adequacy
Assess whether changed production code has adequate test coverage for functionality, regressions, and edge cases.
Run the assessment against your current branch by diffing with origin/main and report whether production code tests are adequate.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To check test coverage adequacy for production code changes, analyze branch diffs alongside existing tests to identify missing tests for new functions, edge cases, and regression paths. This generates a concise suitability report detailing gaps and suggested actions.
Identify missing edge case tests in a pull request diff by mapping changed production code to relevant existing tests. Analyzing this diff coverage reveals untested functionality and regression paths, outputting a report of missing tests and recommended actions.
Yes, you can use diff analysis as a CI quality gate for release readiness. By evaluating branch diffs against test suite coverage data, the assessment verifies whether functionality and edge cases are well-tested before allowing a pull request to merge.
To assess test coverage gaps across modules, you need access to diffs between branches and a test suite with coverage data. The analysis maps production changes to relevant tests and reports missing coverage for regressions and edge cases.
The best way to find untested functionality after modifying code is to analyze the production diff against existing tests. This process maps changed lines to test coverage data, highlighting missing tests for new functionality and edge cases in a suitability report.
Automated test coverage analysis for code review requires a test suite with coverage data and accessible branch diffs. If these prerequisites are missing, or if changes do not touch functionality, edge cases, or regressions, the analysis cannot report missing tests accurately.
soumyarayIdentify changed files and generate a Claude Code test execution plan.
aspelldennyReview code diffs for logic errors, security holes, and performance regressions before merging.
act70255Automate code reviews with static analysis and AI vulnerability detection.
AgentientAnalyze pytest-cov and Istanbul/Jest coverage reports to identify gaps and enforce thresholds.
