hitl

To add human review to an automated codebase workflow, initialize a bounded, resumable human-in-the-loop session. This orchestrates deliberate human judgment using a repo-owned runtime and adapter to persist durable state and decisions.

A bounded human-in-the-loop review workflow inserts deliberate human judgment into automated processes. It keeps review state chunked and resumable with durable artifacts, recording rules and decisions so the loop can continue coherently.

Yes, you need an adapter and runtime artifacts to manage review state in your repository. The adapter persists state and decisions, while the runtime provides durable guardrails and an apply-policy to govern when edits are committed.

You resume an interrupted code review process by relying on the durable artifacts and adapter-driven state management. The resumable human-in-the-loop runtime records previous rules and decisions so the review loop can continue coherently.

Use deliberate human review instead of fully automated changes when automated review is not enough and human judgment is needed. It provides explicit human oversight with an apply-policy to govern exactly when automated edits are committed.