hitl-safety

Implement human-in-the-loop approval for dangerous AgentOS actions.

1|Updated Feb 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/framerslab/agentos-skills --skill hitl-safety
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: hitl-safety
Source: https://github.com/framerslab/agentos-skills/tree/main/registry/curated/hitl-safety
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/framerslab/agentos-skills --skill hitl-safety

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides safety controls for actions that could be destructive, irreversible, expensive, sensitive, or external, ensuring they go through a human or LLM judge approval process before execution.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • HITL Approval Process: Ensures critical actions are reviewed by a human or an LLM judge for safety.
  • Guardrail Checks: Includes post-approval checks for code safety and PII redaction.
  • Use Case: Before sending a mass email or deploying changes to production, this Skill can be used to trigger an approval step that involves a human review or an LLM decision.

Quick Start

Set up the Skill with the appropriate handler (e.g., hitl.cli()) and configure it in your agent settings or code.

Frequently Asked Questions about hitl-safety

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I add human-in-the-loop approval processes for destructive agent actions?

Human-in-the-loop approval processes intercept destructive agent actions like file deletions or financial transactions, routing them to manual review or LLM judging before execution. This ensures critical operations are verified for safety.

Can I use LLM judging instead of manual review for safety guardrails?

LLM judging can replace manual review for safety guardrails, allowing an LLM to evaluate action safety automatically. You can also configure automated approvals with guardrail overrides depending on the risk level.

What's the best way to prevent autonomous agents from sending unapproved emails or executing financial transactions?

Implementing HITL safety controls prevents autonomous agents from executing sensitive external actions like sending mass emails or performing financial transactions without an explicit human or LLM judge approval step.

Does this human-in-the-loop system include post-approval checks for PII redaction and code safety?

Post-approval guardrail checks for code safety and PII redaction are included. These safety controls ensure that even after initial approval, the action is scanned for sensitive data exposure before final execution.

When do I need safety controls with guardrail overrides for my AI workflows?

Safety controls with guardrail overrides are needed for irreversible, expensive, or external AI workflows. They ensure potentially dangerous actions undergo an approval process, providing an automated safety net when human review is unavailable.

Related Skills