hook-rule-interviewer

Designing project-level hook rules involves an interview-first process to map repository risk signals to policy goals, producing a concrete hook policy matrix, coverage matrix, and rollout plan.

Defining YAML-based hook policies requires inspecting repository signals to propose relevant on/when/do/respond surfaces, aligning with frontmatter-driven metadata to establish enforcement styles like audit, warn, block, or approve.

An interview-first process helps create a hook coverage matrix by asking targeted questions to reveal repository risks and objectives, synthesizing the answers into a structured policy brief before drafting any rules.

Yes, you can establish repo-wide command and file safety checks by mapping identified risk signals to appropriate hookify surfaces, deciding enforcement scope, and generating a candidate rule set for the repository.

To configure local hookify YAML rules for project governance, you need to identify your repository risk signals and policy goals, which the interview process uses to generate a structured policy brief and rollout plan.

You should choose between audit, warn, block, or approve enforcement styles based on your project-level policy goals and risk tolerance, finalized through the interview process into a rollout plan.