What problem does it solve? Documents written for people and skills written for agents can state the same rule differently, and neither file records which one changed last. This Skill finds those contradictions, quotes both sides with their evidence, and stops — leaving the decision of which side is wrong to a person instead of guessing. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Counterpart Scoping: Names the conventions a document can contradict before reading, so the audit's range is fixed rather than shaped by whatever happened to be read. - Evidence-Based Comparison: Quotes both sides of every candidate finding with path, line, and exact text — nothing is reported from memory. - Strict Classification: Reports only true contradictions; a rule a skill states and the document omits is out of range, not a gap. - Use Case: After a convention skill ships a new release, run the audit against your project's documentation to surface every place the document now disagrees with the rules in force, then let a maintainer decide which side to fix. ## Quick Start Audit the project's documentation against the installed convention skills and report every contradiction with quoted evidence from both sides.