human-gate-designer

Design human-in-the-loop approval gates for DAG workflows.

181|30|Updated Nov 16, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/curiositech/some_claude_skills --skill human-gate-designer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: human-gate-designer
Source: https://github.com/curiositech/some_claude_skills/tree/main/.claude/skills/human-gate-designer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/curiositech/some_claude_skills --skill human-gate-designer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you design effective human-in-the-loop review points within your Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) workflows, ensuring critical decisions are validated by humans without unnecessary interruptions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Gate Placement Strategy: Provides a decision tree to determine the optimal placement of human gates based on action irreversibility, output user-facing status, cost, and confidence scores.
  • Presentation Design: Defines what information should be presented to the human reviewer, including context, output, confidence, and cost, along with clear action buttons (Approve, Modify, Reject).
  • Feedback Routing: Outlines how human decisions (Approve, Modify, Reject) are routed back into the DAG, including mechanisms for re-execution with feedback.
  • Use Case: When designing a complex data processing pipeline that involves sensitive financial reports, use this skill to strategically place approval gates before irreversible actions like report finalization or before delivering the report to stakeholders.

Quick Start

Use the human-gate-designer skill to design a human review step for a critical data processing node in your DAG.

Frequently Asked Questions about human-gate-designer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I design human-in-the-loop approval gates in a DAG workflow?

Gate placement in a DAG workflow is determined by evaluating action irreversibility, output user-facing status, execution cost, and confidence scores to ensure critical decisions are validated without causing unnecessary process interruptions.

What information should be presented to a reviewer at a workflow approval gate?

A workflow approval gate should present the human reviewer with relevant context, the proposed output, confidence levels, and associated costs, alongside clear action buttons like Approve, Modify, or Reject to capture their decision.

How do I route human decisions back into an automated agent workflow?

Human decisions are routed back into an automated agent workflow by defining feedback propagation logic that triggers DAG re-execution with modifications, passing the reviewer's Approve, Modify, or Reject input directly into downstream nodes.

When should I add a human review process to an automated data pipeline?

You should add a human review process to an automated data pipeline before irreversible actions, such as finalizing sensitive financial reports or delivering outputs to stakeholders, where automated confidence scores are insufficient.

Can I use this approach to balance full automation with human judgment in sensitive processes?

Yes, designing approval gates allows you to balance full automation with human judgment by strategically placing review points in the DAG, ensuring human oversight is applied only to critical nodes requiring validation.