hunt-llm-ai

Identify exploitable LLM/AI vulnerabilities crossing trust boundaries with validation gates.

1.1k|191|Updated Jun 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/uphiago/recon-skills --skill hunt-llm-ai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: hunt-llm-ai
Source: https://github.com/uphiago/recon-skills/tree/main/redteam/hunt-llm-ai
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/uphiago/recon-skills --skill hunt-llm-ai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill solves the common pain point of wasting time on confabulated false positives when testing LLM/AI features, providing a structured validation framework to identify only exploitable vulnerabilities that cross trust boundaries and meet professional reporting standards.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive LLM Bug Coverage: Tests for direct/indirect prompt injection, markdown/tool-use exfiltration, ASCII smuggling, system prompt leakage, IDOR via AI data layers, RAG poisoning, and OWASP Agentic Applications (ASI01-ASI10) flaws.
  • False Positive Elimination: Includes a 5-point validation gate requiring out-of-band callbacks, run-twice reproducibility, anchored leaks, and verifiable cross-tenant artifacts to avoid reporting confabulation or non-exploitable model behavior.
  • Use Case: Use during penetration tests of LLM-backed chatbots, RAG systems, agentic copilots, MCP tools, and AI-powered security scanners to find high-impact, reportable vulnerabilities instead of low-value informational findings.

Quick Start

Use the hunt-llm-ai skill to test the target's LLM-powered chatbot and related AI features for exploitable prompt injection and exfiltration vulnerabilities, validating all findings with out-of-band callbacks to avoid false positives.

Frequently Asked Questions about hunt-llm-ai

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I eliminate false positives when pentesting LLM chatbots for prompt injection?

To eliminate false positives during LLM prompt injection pentesting, validate findings using a 5-point gate that requires out-of-band callbacks, run-twice reproducibility, and verifiable cross-tenant artifacts. This prevents reporting model confabulation as actual vulnerabilities.

What is the best way to test RAG systems for data poisoning vulnerabilities?

Testing RAG systems for data poisoning involves identifying exploitable vulnerabilities that cross trust boundaries aligned with OWASP LLM standards. You validate potential poisoning flaws by verifying cross-tenant artifacts and anchored leaks to ensure the issue is genuinely exploitable.

Can I use this approach to find cross-tenant IDOR vulnerabilities in agentic copilots?

Yes, you can find cross-tenant IDOR vulnerabilities in agentic copilots by testing AI data layers for trust boundary crossings. The validation framework requires verifiable cross-tenant artifacts to confirm the IDOR is exploitable and meets professional reporting standards.

How do I validate system prompt leakage during an AI security assessment?

To validate system prompt leakage during an AI security assessment, use anchored leaks and run-twice reproducibility. This confirms the leaked data is a genuine system prompt extraction rather than a confabulated response from the target LLM.

Does this method cover OWASP Agentic Applications ASI01-ASI10 security flaws?

Yes, this method covers OWASP Agentic Applications ASI01-ASI10 security flaws. It tests agentic copilots and MCP tools for exploitable vulnerabilities, applying a structured validation framework to eliminate false positives and ensure findings meet professional reporting standards.

Why do I need out-of-band callbacks for markdown exfiltration testing in LLMs?

Out-of-band callbacks are needed for markdown exfiltration testing to prove data exfiltration crosses trust boundaries. This validation technique confirms the LLM actually transmitted data externally, distinguishing true exploitable flaws from non-exploitable model behavior or confabulation.