hve-resiliency-research

Analyzes Azure source code and infrastructure to produce evidence-based resiliency findings with P0-P3 priorities.

2|Updated May 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/christopherromero/HVE-Resiliency --skill hve-resiliency-research-christopherromero
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: hve-resiliency-research
Source: https://github.com/christopherromero/HVE-Resiliency/tree/main/.github/skills/hve-resiliency-research
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/christopherromero/HVE-Resiliency --skill hve-resiliency-research-christopherromero

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Engineering teams running Azure workloads often lack a systematic way to evaluate whether their code and infrastructure can survive zone failures and regional outages. This Skill runs a structured five-phase research-to-assessment workflow that inspects source code and IaC, producing evidence-based resiliency findings with file and line references and a prioritized P0-P3 remediation plan. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Five-Phase Workflow: Runs core research (Prompts 0-7), service-specific research for Azure services like AKS, Cosmos DB, SQL, Redis, and Key Vault (Prompts 8-19), consolidation, planning, and a final code-level resiliency assessment report. - Evidence-Only Research: Keeps research phases forensic with file and line citations, no remediation or code examples, and classifies every finding as P0, P1, P2, or P3. - Flexible Execution Modes: Supports Mode A (interactive, one prompt per turn with /clear between steps) and Mode B (autonomous subagent orchestration with up to three parallel service prompts). - Use Case: A team preparing an Azure multi-region active/active deployment invokes the skill to audit zone survivability and regional failover readiness, receiving a consolidated research document, a master remediation plan, and a code-level assessment report. ## Quick Start Run /hve-resiliency-research in Copilot Chat, choose Mode A or Mode B when prompted, and let the workflow begin at Phase 1 Prompt 0.

Frequently Asked Questions about hve-resiliency-research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run an Azure resiliency assessment on my codebase?

Invoke /hve-resiliency-research in Copilot Chat after installing the skill into your repository's .github folder. Choose Mode A for interactive step-by-step execution or Mode B for autonomous subagent runs, and the workflow starts at Phase 1 Prompt 0.

What Azure services does the resiliency research workflow cover?

Phase 2 includes dedicated prompts for App Gateway, Azure Functions, Key Vault, AKS with Istio, Cosmos DB, SQL Server, Redis, Azure Storage, Kafka, Networking, Entra ID, and APIM. Only services detected in your dependency inventory are researched.

What is the difference between Mode A and Mode B execution?

Mode A runs one prompt per turn and requires /clear between steps so you can review each artifact. Mode B dispatches each prompt as an isolated subagent without pausing, allowing up to three parallel service prompts in Phase 2.

Does the research phase include remediation recommendations?

No. Phases 1-3 are evidence-only and forensic, with file and line citations but no remediation or code examples. Remediation guidance appears only in the Phase 4 planning outputs and Phase 5 assessment report.

Where are the resiliency research outputs written?

Research artifacts go to .copilot-tracking/research/ with the repository name as file prefix. Planning documents go to .copilot-tracking/plans/, and the final report is written to Microsoft Assessment/{serviceName}-Code-Level-Resiliency-Assessment.md.

Why does the workflow stop between phases instead of running fully autonomously?

Phases are strictly sequential and user-gated because consolidation prompts are long-running and time out under autonomous orchestration. Stopping between phases also lets engineers review and validate artifacts before proceeding.