skills.rest
galatanovidiu
galatanovidiuCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

hyper-code-review

Automates a structured three-pass code review of diffs.

2|1|Updated Apr 20, 2026
Search Tags:#automation#validation#standards#diff#code-review#bug-tracking
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/galatanovidiu/hyper7 --skill hyper-code-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: hyper-code-review
Source: https://github.com/galatanovidiu/hyper7/tree/main/skills/hyper-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/galatanovidiu/hyper7 --skill hyper-code-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

An organized approach to evaluating code diffs by running a three-pass review that targets spec compliance, bug-finding, and standards conformance, then validates conclusions to produce a single, actionable verdict.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Three ordered review passes: spec compliance, bug-finding, and standards compliance, followed by a validation step.
  • Embedded mode for hyper-verify tasks and standalone mode for archiving reviews of arbitrary diffs.
  • Produces a single markdown "review" block and supports cross-agent parallelism for faster turnarounds.
  • Archives completed reviews or seeds follow-up tasks when critical issues are found.

Quick Start

Invoke the hyper-code-review skill on the current diff to run a structured three-pass review.

Frequently Asked Questions about hyper-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for a diff to check spec compliance and bugs?▼

Automated code review for a diff is handled by running a structured three-pass process that targets spec compliance, bug detection, and standards conformance, then validates conclusions to produce a single actionable review block.

What is the best way to structure code reviews for pull requests and branches?▼

The best way to structure code reviews for pull requests and branches is using a standalone execution mode that archives completed reviews of arbitrary diffs and produces a single markdown verdict after validation.

Can I use a structured code review process within an existing task workflow?▼

Yes, structured code review can be embedded directly within task workflows using an embedded mode designed for verification tasks, supporting cross-agent parallelism for faster turnarounds.

Does this code review approach support archiving reviews and seeding follow-up tasks?▼

Yes, the code review approach supports archiving completed reviews or automatically seeding follow-up tasks when critical issues are found during the validation step.

What are the limitations of using a three-pass code review for standards conformance?▼

A limitation of the three-pass code review is that it produces a single review block only after a validation step, meaning the process must fully complete all passes before delivering the final standards conformance verdict.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
borealBytesborealBytes
7

autoreview

Automate structured code review for local branches, PRs, and patch sets.

Community
Advanced
sheer-reysheer-rey

executing-plans

Executes multi-step software implementation plans with validation and progress tracking.

Community
Advanced
galatanovidiugalatanovidiu
2

hyper-verify

Run tests, triage code review, and validate acceptance criteria into checks.md.

Community
Advanced
chriswickettchriswickett

commit

Create atomic git commits using a three-pass workflow.

Community
Advanced