hyperplan

Name: hyperplan
Availability: InStock
Author: Haydern

Orchestrate a 5-member adversarial team to critique proposals and distill defensible insights into an executable plan.

Updated Jun 11, 2026

Search Tags:#planning #risk-management #adversarial #distillation #executable-plan #team-critiquing #cross-attack

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/HaydernCenterpoint/Codex-Skills --skill hyperplan

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: hyperplan
Source: https://github.com/HaydernCenterpoint/Codex-Skills/tree/main/skills/hyperplan
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HaydernCenterpoint/Codex-Skills --skill hyperplan

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Lead a 5-member adversarial team to critique proposals and distill only defensible insights into an executable plan.

Core Features & Use Cases

Adversarial cross-critique to surface weaknesses and confirm defensible conclusions.
Phase-driven workflow (Phase 0 through Phase 7) with independent analysis, cross-attack, defense, and a mandatory handoff to a plan agent.
Structured insight bundle including hard constraints, decisions, risks, and open questions to guide execution.

Quick Start

Kick off the seven-phase Hyperplan workflow and hand the resulting insight bundle to the plan agent for execution.

Frequently Asked Questions about hyperplan

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How does adversarial distillation improve complex planning?▼

Adversarial distillation improves complex planning by deploying a 5-member team to cross-attack proposals, defend conclusions, and distill only defensible insights into a structured executable plan. This surfaces weaknesses early and enforces phase-based discipline across a seven-phase workflow.

What is the best way to surface risks and constraints during executable plan generation?▼

Executable plan generation surfaces risks and constraints by running independent analysis and cross-attack phases, then handing off a structured insight bundle to a dedicated plan agent. This bundle explicitly reports hard constraints, decisions, risks, and open questions to guide execution.

How do I start a structured team-critiquing workflow for robust planning?▼

You start structured team-critiquing for robust planning by kicking off the seven-phase workflow from Phase 0. The process orchestrates independent analysis, cross-attack, and defense among five members before a mandatory handoff to the plan agent.

Can I use adversarial cross-critique for team risk management?▼

Yes, you can use adversarial cross-critique for team risk management. The 5-member adversarial team independently critiques proposals to surface weaknesses, confirming only defensible conclusions before distilling them into a risk-reporting insight bundle.

When should I avoid using a multi-phase adversarial planning workflow?▼

You should avoid using a multi-phase adversarial planning workflow for simple tasks that do not require deep risk management or cross-attack validation, as the strict seven-phase discipline and mandatory handoff to a plan agent introduce significant processing overhead.