hypothesis-formulation

Generate structured hypotheses with success, failure, and fallback criteria from vague research questions.

Updated Mar 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/EmaRimoldi/Claude-scholar-extended --skill hypothesis-formulation
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: hypothesis-formulation
Source: https://github.com/EmaRimoldi/Claude-scholar-extended/tree/main/skills/hypothesis-formulation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/EmaRimoldi/Claude-scholar-extended --skill hypothesis-formulation

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The skill helps researchers convert vague research ideas into structured, falsifiable hypotheses with explicit success and failure criteria, null hypotheses, and clear fallback strategies.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Hypothesis construction: primary H1, secondary H2/H3, null H0, and a falsifiability check with concrete evaluation plans.
  • Success/failure criteria: quantitative thresholds, significance levels, and ambiguous-zone handling.
  • Competing explanations and risk assessment: document alternatives, fallback plans, and resource estimates.
  • Outputs and integration: generates docs at $PROJECT_DIR/docs/hypotheses.md and $PROJECT_DIR/docs/ranked-hypotheses.md for prioritization.
  • Workflow integration: compatible with standalone ideation or post-novelty assessment step in the research pipeline.

Quick Start

Provide your research idea in free text and the skill will generate structured hypotheses, success criteria, and fallbacks.

Frequently Asked Questions about hypothesis-formulation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I turn a vague research idea into a testable hypothesis?

To turn a vague research idea into a testable hypothesis, you structure it using the SMART framework, define explicit null hypotheses, and establish concrete evaluation plans with quantitative success and failure thresholds.

What is the best way to structure primary, secondary, and null hypotheses?

Structuring primary, secondary, and null hypotheses requires defining H1, H2, H3, and explicit H0 statements. You must include a falsifiability check and document competing explanations alongside concrete evaluation plans.

How do I define success and failure criteria for experimental design?

Defining success and failure criteria for experimental design involves setting quantitative thresholds, specifying significance levels, and establishing clear rules for handling ambiguous zones in your data analysis.

Can I generate ranked hypothesis documentation for post-novelty assessment workflows?

Yes, you can generate ranked hypothesis documentation by outputting structured Markdown files. This process prioritizes hypotheses and supports standalone ideation or post-novelty assessment steps in a research pipeline.

How do I plan fallback strategies and risk assessments for research ideation?

Planning fallback strategies and risk assessments for research ideation involves documenting alternative explanations, creating fallback plans for failed tests, and estimating resource requirements for each hypothesis.