hypothesis-triangulator

You can validate code hypotheses by cross-referencing them against Git history, legacy docs, code comments, and test evidence to assign a confidence score for your decision-making workflow.

Hypothesis triangulation is the process of validating assumptions by cross-referencing multiple independent sources like Git history, documentation, and domain owner interviews to assign a confidence score.

Yes, confidence scoring evaluates hardcoded values by analyzing code, documentation, and naming patterns to determine if they are placeholders awaiting domain owner input.

Yes, you need Git repository access because the validation process cross-references Git history alongside documentation and domain knowledge to generate accurate confidence scores.

The best way to score confidence in legacy code assumptions is to cross-reference Git analysis, legacy docs, and domain owner interviews to systematically validate the hypothesis.

You should avoid automated hypothesis validation when you lack access to Git repositories or domain knowledge, as confidence scoring requires cross-referencing multiple independent sources.