i-doc-review

Identify inaccuracies, outdated steps, and misleading guidance in docs-only changes.

12|1|Updated Dec 27, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/apokamo/kaji --skill i-doc-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: i-doc-review
Source: https://github.com/apokamo/kaji/tree/main/.claude/skills/i-doc-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/apokamo/kaji --skill i-doc-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

docs-only の変更をレビューし、事実整合性・実装整合性・運用整合性の観点から判定する。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 変更差分の事実確認と整合性検証
  • 実装手順・運用ドキュメントの一貫性チェック
  • Use Case: 設計ドキュメントの更新後の影響をレビュアーが指摘する

Quick Start

Run i-doc-review on the latest docs-only update to surface factual, implementation, and operational inconsistencies.

Frequently Asked Questions about i-doc-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review documentation changes for factual and operational consistency?

Reviewing documentation changes for consistency involves identifying inaccuracies, outdated steps, and misleading guidance in design drafts, implementation guides, and operation procedures, returning actionable findings supported by explicit evidence and references.

What is the best way to fact-check implementation guides and operational procedures?

The best way to fact-check implementation guides is to verify updates against current docs and linked materials, surfacing factual, implementation, and operational inconsistencies with actionable findings.

Can I use automated docs review to identify outdated steps in design drafts?

Yes, automated docs review can identify outdated steps in design drafts by applying the review process to surface factual, implementation, and operational inconsistencies with explicit evidence.

How do I verify change management consistency in docs-only updates?

Verifying change management consistency in docs-only updates involves checking the updated documentation for inaccuracies and operational consistency, returning actionable findings with explicit evidence and references to current docs.

Does docs review work without dependencies to check implementation guides?

Yes, docs review works without dependencies to check implementation guides by analyzing the changes in design drafts, implementation guides, and operation procedures, returning actionable findings supported by explicit evidence.

What are the limitations of reviewing docs-only changes for accuracy?

The limitations of reviewing docs-only changes for accuracy include relying on explicit evidence and references to current docs and linked materials to validate factual, implementation, and operational consistency.