icj

Retrieve ICJ and PCIJ case law and Article 36(2) declarations from icj-cij.org.

2|Updated May 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/StianOby/claude-legal-tools --skill icj
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: icj
Source: https://github.com/StianOby/claude-legal-tools/tree/main/skills/icj
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/StianOby/claude-legal-tools --skill icj

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires requests, beautifulsoup4, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Manually searching the official ICJ/PCIJ website for case law, jurisdictional rules, and state optional-clause declarations is time-consuming, and pre-trained knowledge often lacks up-to-date declaration text that is only authoritative on icj-cij.org.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • ICJ/PCIJ Case Law Lookup: Retrieve contentious and advisory cases, including PCIJ Series A/B/A/B judgments and advisory opinions from 1922-1940, with direct links to official PDFs.
  • Jurisdictional Analysis: Access the Court's official jurisdiction pages, including state eligibility to appear, treaty bases for jurisdiction, and UN organs authorized to request advisory opinions.
  • Article 36(2) Declaration Comparison: Retrieve and compare verbatim optional-clause declarations from any state to assess compulsory jurisdiction for cross-border disputes, with built-in guidance for applying reciprocity rules.
  • Use Case: A legal researcher can quickly verify if Norway and Finland have overlapping compulsory jurisdiction for a territorial dispute by comparing their Article 36(2) declarations directly via the skill.

Quick Start

Use the icj skill to retrieve the full text of Norway's Article 36(2) optional-clause declaration and compare it side-by-side with Finland's to assess whether the ICJ has compulsory jurisdiction for a territorial dispute between the two states.

Frequently Asked Questions about icj

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I retrieve ICJ and PCIJ case law for international dispute research?

ICJ and PCIJ case law can be retrieved by scraping official icj-cij.org content, providing direct links to official PDFs for contentious cases, advisory opinions, and historical PCIJ Series A/B judgments from 1922-1940.

How do I compare Article 36(2) optional clause declarations for jurisdictional analysis?

Article 36(2) optional clause declarations are retrieved verbatim from icj-cij.org and compared side-by-side to assess compulsory jurisdiction, applying built-in guidance for reciprocity rules in cross-border disputes.

Can I use this for verifying state acceptance of ICJ compulsory jurisdiction?

Verifying state acceptance of ICJ compulsory jurisdiction is supported by fetching authoritative, up-to-date state declarations directly from icj-cij.org, bypassing the limitations of pre-trained knowledge.

Does this approach cache international court jurisdiction data to avoid slow retrieval?

Slow-changing jurisdiction data is cached for freshness, ensuring efficient retrieval of state eligibility, treaty bases for jurisdiction, and UN organs authorized to request advisory opinions.

What are the limitations when scraping icj-cij.org for legal materials?

Limitations include filtering out out-of-scope pleadings and verbatim records, restricting retrieval to case law, jurisdictional rules, and state optional-clause declarations available on the official icj-cij.org domain.

What's the best way to analyze territorial dispute jurisdiction between two states?

Analyzing territorial dispute jurisdiction is best done by retrieving and comparing the Article 36(2) declarations of the specific states involved to determine overlapping compulsory jurisdiction with reciprocity analysis guidance.