idea-critic

Coordinate multi-model critiques of research hypotheses and designs.

Updated Apr 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sheehe/coase --skill idea-critic
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: idea-critic
Source: https://github.com/sheehe/coase/tree/main/resources/plugins/coase-builtin/skills/idea-critic
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sheehe/coase --skill idea-critic

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Coordinates independent, multi-model critiques of research hypotheses, designs, and results to improve robustness and insight.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel, multi-model evaluation across hypothesis, design, and result critique.
  • Modes: discuss, score, design-critique, result-critique, preserving per-model outputs with a unified consensus summary.
  • Human-in-the-loop support and configurable critic providers to balance bias and comprehensiveness.

Quick Start

Coordinate independent, multi-model critiques of the given hypothesis set using all selected providers and return per-model analyses with a final consensus summary.

Frequently Asked Questions about idea-critic

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run multi-model critiques on a research hypothesis?

To run multi-model critiques on a research hypothesis, configure a diverse panel of providers to perform parallel evaluations. The system coordinates independent critiques and returns per-model analyses alongside a final consensus and divergence summary.

What is multimodel consensus evaluation for research design?

Multimodel consensus evaluation for research design is a technique where independent providers critique a study's methodology. It generates per-model outputs with preserved raw responses and aggregates them into a structured summary highlighting agreement and divergence.

Can I use human-in-the-loop review during multimodel design critique?

Yes, you can use human-in-the-loop review during multimodel design critique. The system supports configurable critic providers and human-in-the-loop interactions to balance provider bias and comprehensiveness across hypothesis evaluation and result critique.

What modes are available for research result critique?

Available modes for research result critique include discuss, score, design-critique, and result-critique. These modes preserve per-model outputs and generate a unified consensus summary to improve research robustness and insight.

When should I use multimodel critiques instead of a single model for research evaluation?

You should use multimodel critiques instead of a single model when you need to balance bias and improve robustness across hypothesis evaluation. Coordinating a diverse panel of providers ensures structured aggregation with consensus and divergence summaries.