Evaluate research ideas for long-term impact using an IEEE Micro Top Picks lens.
npx skills add https://github.com/UnaryLab/ai-for-research --skill idea-evaluate
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: idea-evaluate Source: https://github.com/UnaryLab/ai-for-research/tree/main/skills/idea-evaluate Command: npx skills add https://github.com/UnaryLab/ai-for-research --skill idea-evaluate
This Skill helps you evaluate whether a research idea has the novelty and long-term impact potential needed to convince top computer-architecture venues, before you spend months building toward a likely dead end.
Use it when you want to sanity-check “is this any good,” “is this novel,” “would this be Top Picks,” or when you need a critique of an idea, abstract, proposal, or even a one-sentence direction—especially for computer architecture and Top-Picks-eligible adjacent venues.
Ask the AI to evaluate the following research idea and return the Top Picks lens narrative critique with a verdict and concrete moves to strengthen it.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
You can critique a research proposal by generating an impact case, criterion-by-criterion read, and adversarial counter-read that stress-tests the idea's durability, influence pathway clarity, and evidence-readiness.
Yes, you can receive a peer review critique for a one-sentence research direction, as the evaluation process applies to concepts ranging from single sentences to full abstracts and proposal drafts.
The best way to stress-test a research idea for novelty is to frame the strongest impact case, then probe it with an adversarial counter-read that identifies the strongest arguments against the idea and what the author would defend.
No, the idea evaluation process does not assign numeric scores, but instead produces a prose verdict tiering and prioritized strengthening moves to improve the research direction.
You need an IEEE Micro Top Picks style assessment when you want to sanity-check if a research idea is novel or durable enough for top computer architecture venues and Top-Picks-eligible adjacent venues before investing months of work.
huangwb8Generate bilingual NSFC abstracts with five-sentence structure and length validation.
GratefulJinx77Simulate 32 expert perspectives to analyze arguments for logical fallacies and hidden assumptions.
caw111Develop structured grant proposals from validated research ideas.
TabithaFannySearch communications literature across IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, and ACM Digital Library.
