idea_falsifier_agent

You can falsify a condensed matter research idea by running a Popper-style falsification workflow that applies physical constraints and literature checks to produce a clear PASS, INCUBATE, or KILL verdict.

Popper-style falsification in SP-STM research governance is a structured risk assessment process that evaluates theory consistency and experimental feasibility against hard thresholds to prevent pursuing unviable physics ideas.

To check experimental feasibility, the falsification workflow applies Layer 2 constraints requiring specific numeric calculations such as energy-resolution limits to determine if the idea meets hard physical thresholds.

You cannot proceed with a KILL verdict from the falsification assessment unless you provide new physical inputs, as the workflow enforces ontology-based guardrails to prevent advancing on identified KILL reasons.

When your SP-STM research idea receives an INCUBATE verdict, you should generate a minimal validation experiment or kill question to reduce uncertainty quickly and determine the next actionable risk-focused steps.

The falsification workflow supports supervisor-assigned and literature-driven research ideas by routing them through theory-first, experiment-first, or prior-art-first checks based on their origin and layered constraints.