Generate and rank solution approaches for code-shaped planning problems.
npx skills add https://github.com/mslshao/claude-harness --skill ideate-mslshao
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: ideate Source: https://github.com/mslshao/claude-harness/tree/main/dotclaude/skills/ideate Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mslshao/claude-harness --skill ideate-mslshao
This Skill helps when you understand the problem but do not yet know which solution approach to pursue. It turns vague or mixed planning inputs into a ranked set of distinct options, pressure-tests the leading candidates, and recommends a winner with clear tradeoffs.
Ask the ideate skill to compare several implementation approaches for your problem statement and recommend the best one to take forward.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Solution approach comparison generates three to five distinct architecture options, scores them across effort, risk, and reversibility, and applies an adversarial skeptic review to recommend a winning strategy.
Evaluating implementation strategies from mixed inputs involves reconciling disagreements across Slack threads, Confluence pages, and transcripts, then ranking solution options through structured scoring and a mandatory decision gate.
Yes, structured tradeoff analysis applies to Jira ticket feature design by consuming bead IDs and ticket context to produce ranked solution options with clear tradeoffs before execution planning begins.
Ranking solution options during software design involves scoring each approach across effort, risk, reversibility, fit, rules alignment, verifiability, and consequence of being wrong to identify the safest path forward.
You need adversarial review for architecture direction selection when pressure-testing leading candidates against potential biases, ensuring the final recommendation survives a mandatory skeptic review before proceeding.
Automated decision making for complex feature strategy may route to iteration or ask narrowing questions if inputs lack clarity, meaning it escalates rather than forcing a choice when context is insufficient.
victormacaubasLoad session context from Jira, Confluence, and Obsidian into a structured briefing.
tetetratraCompare solution approaches and select an implementation plan with trade-offs.
EvolutionAPIRun the same prompt through Claude, Codex, and Gemini in parallel and synthesize results.
aivos-xieDevelop and deploy lightweight web applications on Linux servers with Flask or Node.js.
