impact-review

Audit impact evaluation reports for causal inference validity.

3|Updated Jun 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/amnotyoung/dev-eval-agents --skill impact-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: impact-review
Source: https://github.com/amnotyoung/dev-eval-agents/tree/main/skills/impact-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/amnotyoung/dev-eval-agents --skill impact-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the lack of standardized methodological rigor in impact evaluation reports by providing a structured audit framework based on causal inference principles.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Methodological Audit: Evaluates causal identification strategies such as PSM, DiD, and RCT for validity and robustness.
  • Structured Assessment: Applies a 5-axis, 10-question framework to determine if a report is suitable, conditionally acceptable, or unsuitable.
  • Use Case: When reviewing an ODA project's impact evaluation report, use this tool to verify if the counterfactual design and statistical approach are sound before final human approval.

Quick Start

Use the impact-review skill to audit the methodology of the impact evaluation report located in the current project directory.

Frequently Asked Questions about impact-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit the methodology of an impact evaluation report?

Auditing an impact evaluation report involves applying a structured 5-axis, 10-question framework to evaluate causal identification strategies like PSM, DiD, and RCT, determining if the methodology is suitable, conditionally acceptable, or unsuitable.

What is a counterfactual design in causal inference for development projects?

A counterfactual design in causal inference establishes what would have occurred without an intervention, serving as the core mechanism for verifying statistical robustness and project accountability in ODA impact evaluations.

Can I use this methodological audit for ODA project assessments?

Yes, you can use this methodological audit for ODA project assessments because it strictly adheres to KOICA Evaluation Guidelines and specific causal identification criteria to ensure evidence-based project accountability.

How does the 5-axis assessment framework evaluate statistical robustness?

The 5-axis assessment framework evaluates statistical robustness by applying 10 targeted questions to an impact evaluation report, verifying the validity of the counterfactual design and causal identification strategies.

When do I need to verify causal identification strategies in an impact evaluation?

You need to verify causal identification strategies in an impact evaluation when reviewing a development assistance project report to ensure methodological validity and a sound statistical approach before final human approval.

What are the limitations of using causal inference frameworks for project accountability?

A limitation of using causal inference frameworks for project accountability is that the audit determines methodological suitability but still requires final human approval to fully validate evidence-based project accountability.