implementation-readiness-gate

Consolidate clarification evidence and contract reviews into a go, go-with-caveats, or no-go decision.

16|Updated Apr 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/glaucia86/skills --skill implementation-readiness-gate
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: implementation-readiness-gate
Source: https://github.com/glaucia86/skills/tree/main/implementation-readiness-gate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/glaucia86/skills --skill implementation-readiness-gate

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It prevents teams from starting implementation with weak or conflicting task evidence by forcing one explicit, evidence-based execution decision.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evidence consolidation gate: Reviews an available clarification artifact and, if present, a contract review verdict to produce a single decision (go, go-with-caveats, or no-go).
  • Conservative safety constraints: Flags missing or contradictory inputs, does not override negative review evidence, and requires that caveats not be hidden inside a go.
  • Repository validation awareness: Ensures the validation plan is linked to real repository mechanisms rather than generic placeholders.
  • Use case: Before coding an important feature, run this gate to decide whether the current clarification and review artifacts justify safe progress, or whether the artifacts must be strengthened first.

Quick Start

Use implementation-readiness-gate with your Clarification Summary and any contract review result to get a single decision of go, go-with-caveats, or no-go.

Frequently Asked Questions about implementation-readiness-gate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I decide go or no-go before coding a feature with ambiguous requirements?

An implementation readiness gate consolidates clarification evidence and contract review verdicts into a single execution decision. It validates scope, resolves ambiguity, and returns exactly go, go-with-caveats, or no-go to prevent starting implementation with weak artifacts.

What is an implementation gate in pre-coding workflow stages?

An implementation gate is a pre-coding checkpoint that applies checklist-based validation to scope and ambiguity resolution. It reviews clarification summaries and optional contract verdicts to produce a single workflow decision without changing the underlying artifact strength.

How do I handle contradictory task artifacts before starting implementation?

A readiness gate flags missing or contradictory inputs as conservative safety constraints. It does not override negative review evidence and ensures caveats are not hidden inside a go decision, requiring artifacts to be strengthened before safe progress can proceed.

Does repository validation matter for implementation readiness checks?

Repository validation awareness ensures the validation plan is linked to real repository mechanisms rather than generic placeholders. This checklist-based validation confirms that scope and ambiguity resolution are backed by actual repository mechanisms before returning a workflow decision.

Can I use an implementation gate with partial clarification evidence?

Yes, the gate applies to cases with partial or contradictory artifacts. It consolidates available clarification summaries and optional contract review verdicts, returning go-with-caveats when evidence is sufficient but incomplete, or no-go when risks require explicit approval edges.

When should I not use a pre-coding readiness gate?

You should not use it when implementation can safely proceed without explicit approval edges or when task evidence is unambiguous and complete. The gate targets pre-coding stages where tasks are ambiguous, risks require approval, or artifacts may be partial or contradictory.