skills.rest
cmb-sy
cmb-syCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

implementation-review

Review implementation plans across clarity, feasibility, and consistency.

1|Updated Sep 8, 2023
Search Tags:#implementation#codex#review#traceability#report#design-review#parallel-processing
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/cmb-sy/dotfiles --skill implementation-review-cmb-sy
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: implementation-review
Source: https://github.com/cmb-sy/dotfiles/tree/main/claude/skills/implementation-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cmb-sy/dotfiles --skill implementation-review-cmb-sy

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

The Implementation Review Orchestrator enables parallel reviews of software implementation plans across clarity, feasibility, and consistency, consolidating approved findings into a unified report, and supports optional Codex-based reviews and meta-reviews when requested.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel multi-perspective review across clarity, feasibility, and consistency to surface findings quickly.
  • Integrated reporting that applies only user-approved fixes to the plan.
  • Optional Codex-based review and meta-review when requested, enhancing quality and coverage.
  • design alignment and traceability checks across the plan and related documents.
  • Phase-driven workflow with UI-spec verification and trace logging for handover.

Quick Start

Start the review by providing the target implementation plan path; if none is provided, the system will automatically identify the most recently updated plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about implementation-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review an implementation plan for clarity, feasibility, and consistency?▼

Implementation plan review across clarity, feasibility, and consistency is orchestrated by running a parallel, multi-perspective analysis that surfaces findings and consolidates user-approved fixes into a unified report.

What is the best way to consolidate code review findings into an actionable report?▼

Consolidating code review findings into an actionable report requires validating structured findings before applying fixes, ensuring the final unified document contains only approved modifications to the implementation plan.

Can I use Codex for automated design review and traceability checks?▼

Codex-based review and meta-review are supported as optional enhancements for design review, enabling automated design alignment and traceability checks across the implementation plan and related documents.

How do I verify UI specifications and handle trace logging for implementation handover?▼

Verifying UI specifications and handling trace logging for handover is executed through a phase-driven workflow that integrates UI-spec verification and trace management directly into the implementation plan review process.

Do I need to specify a file path to start a parallel implementation review?▼

Specifying a file path is not required to start a parallel implementation review; if no target implementation plan path is provided, the system automatically identifies the most recently updated plan for processing.

Why does the implementation plan review require validation before applying fixes?▼

Implementation plan review requires validation before applying fixes to enforce structured, actionable findings, preventing unverified modifications from being automatically consolidated into the final unified report.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
eai-toolseai-tools

3_gofer_plan

Generate technical implementation plans with architecture, data models, and contracts.

Official
Advanced
INNERJOINTINNERJOINT

deep-dive

Trace root causes and produce interview-driven specifications for downstream planning.

Community
Advanced
cmb-sycmb-sy
1

spec-review

Analyze design documents through parallel multi-perspective reviews.

Community
Advanced
CaptainCrouton89CaptainCrouton89
497

Reviewing Code

Evaluate code changes for security, correctness, performance, and spec alignment.

Community
Basic