implementation-review

Identify and report deviations between code behavior and story acceptance criteria.

Updated Mar 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/heymishy/2x2-v3-28-03-20216 --skill implementation-review-heymishy
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: implementation-review
Source: https://github.com/heymishy/2x2-v3-28-03-20216/tree/main/.github/skills/implementation-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/heymishy/2x2-v3-28-03-20216 --skill implementation-review-heymishy

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps teams validate that implementation work aligns with story acceptance criteria and quality standards, enabling early detection of gaps before merging.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Stage 1 — Spec compliance: verify that changes implement the ACs exactly and that no unrequested behavior is introduced.
  • Stage 2 — Code quality: assess structure, readability, maintainability, and adherence to project conventions; flag critical issues that block progress.
  • Use Case: Before Opening a PR, after completing a batch of related tasks, or when something seems off during implementation.

Quick Start

Run the implementation-review skill after completing a task batch to validate spec compliance and code quality before opening a PR.

Frequently Asked Questions about implementation-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate code behavior against story acceptance criteria before opening a pull request?

Validate code behavior against story acceptance criteria by running a two-stage implementation review that checks spec compliance and code quality before opening a pull request. It identifies deviations and outputs structured remediation guidance.

What is a two-stage implementation review for spec compliance and code quality?

A two-stage implementation review is a validation process that first verifies changes implement acceptance criteria exactly without unrequested behavior, then assesses code structure, readability, and maintainability to flag critical blocking issues.

When should I perform an implementation review during the development process?

Perform an implementation review at key checkpoints: after completing a batch of related tasks, before opening a pull request, or when issues arise during implementation. This timing ensures early detection of spec and quality gaps.

How do I check for unrequested behavior introduced during code implementation?

Check for unrequested behavior by applying the spec compliance stage of an implementation review, which verifies that code changes implement acceptance criteria exactly and identifies any deviations or unrequested behavior introduced.

What's the best way to structure remediation guidance for code quality issues?

The best way to structure remediation guidance is using provided review templates that assess code structure, readability, maintainability, and project conventions, flagging critical issues that block progress before merging.

Does this implementation review process work without external dependencies?

Yes, the implementation review process works without external dependencies, relying on structured templates and a two-stage validation workflow to guide spec compliance and code quality remediation directly.