implementation-review-orchestration

Orchestrate implementation-time review subagents and aggregate next-action guidance.

Updated Apr 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/koseki2580/skills --skill implementation-review-orchestration
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: implementation-review-orchestration
Source: https://github.com/koseki2580/skills/tree/main/skills/implementation-review-orchestration
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/koseki2580/skills --skill implementation-review-orchestration

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It prevents expensive rework during coding by orchestrating targeted implementation-time review subagents and turning their findings into clear next actions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Implementation-time, not PR-time review: focuses on next 1–5 moves for in-progress diffs and avoids creating PR comments.
  • Structured context acquisition: centralizes what the main agent must collect (diff, changed symbols/files, phase, test status, logs, project rules, plus optional dynamic/historical/spec consistency context).
  • Risk-flag driven agent routing: selects a small set of specialist reviewers (typically up to 4, up to 6 for high-risk changes) based on phase and risk flags, then aggregates results into blocking/important/next_actions.
  • Finishing-phase validation guardrails: ensures validation gaps are surfaced and targets the meta-reviewer when needed for safe continuation.
  • Accountability and deduped aggregation: uses the orchestration accountability format, consolidates duplicate findings, and identifies concentrated risks.

Quick Start

Ask your AI coding main agent to run implementation-review-orchestration for the current in-progress diff, providing current phase, changed files/symbols, test status, any error logs, and available project_rules so it can select appropriate implementation-time subagents and return internal next actions.

Frequently Asked Questions about implementation-review-orchestration

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review in-progress code changes without creating PR comments?

To derisk in-progress coding, implementation review orchestration selects specialist subagents based on risk flags, aggregates their findings, and returns focused next-action guidance without creating PR comments.

What is implementation-time review and how does it manage code change safety?

Implementation-time review is a mechanism that orchestrates targeted subagents to evaluate code change safety during active development, aggregating risk flags into blocking issues and ordered recommended next actions.

How do I run subagent orchestration for spec consistency and test validation?

You provide centralized diff context, phase, and test status to route risk-flag-based specialist agents, which run lightweight test validation and spec consistency checks, returning aggregated next actions.

Can I use implementation review orchestration during the finishing phase of coding?

Yes, during finishing phases, implementation review orchestration surfaces validation gaps and targets a meta-reviewer when needed, ensuring safe continuation and a final can_proceed decision.

When do I need a meta-reviewer for risk flags in my current diff?

You need a meta-reviewer when finishing-phase validation gaps are surfaced and defined conditions are met, consolidating concentrated risks before issuing a final can_proceed decision.

What context do I need to collect for implementation review subagents?

You must collect centralized diff context including changed symbols, files, phase, test status, logs, and project rules, providing missing-context reasons for risk-flag-based agent selection.