implementation-spec

You can bridge refined PBIs and architecture context into a structured implementation contract that enumerates delta specs, design decisions, and a task breakdown with acceptance criteria traceability.

A delta specification defines the precise changes needed to implement a PBI, and you need one when acceptance criteria are ready and a traceable implementation plan must be produced across multiple artifacts.

To ensure acceptance criteria traceability, generate a task breakdown that maps each task back to the acceptance criteria, then run a completeness self-check to verify all requirements are covered before hand-off.

Generating design decisions and task breakdowns requires refined PBIs alongside architecture context, as the process bridges both inputs into a complete implementation contract suitable for hand-off.

The best way to document cross-cutting design decisions is to bridge refined PBIs and architecture context into a structured implementation contract that explicitly enumerates those decisions alongside delta specs and a task breakdown.

You should not use an implementation spec generator when acceptance criteria are not yet ready or when cross-cutting decisions are unresolved, as the output requires these inputs to produce a traceable and complete task breakdown.