implementation-workflow

Coordinate surveyverse SKILL implementation through draft, review, and resolve stages.

1|Updated Feb 17, 2026

Search Tags:#workflow #planning #documentation #implementation #adversarial-review #decisions-log #stage-routing

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/JDenn0514/surveycore --skill implementation-workflow-jdenn0514

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: implementation-workflow
Source: https://github.com/JDenn0514/surveycore/tree/main/.claude/skills/implementation-workflow
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/JDenn0514/surveycore --skill implementation-workflow-jdenn0514

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Coordinates the full implementation lifecycle for surveyverse SKILLs, enabling teams to draft an implementation plan from a finalized spec, conduct adversarial reviews, and log decisions to hand off to downstream workstreams.

Core Features & Use Cases

Three-stage workflow: Stage 1 Draft, Stage 2 Adversarial Review, Stage 3 Resolve with a decisions log.
Stage routing and references: Provides contextual prompts to guide which stage to run and references stage-specific guidance before actions.
Artifacts and handoffs: Produces plan documents, review files, and a decisions log for governance and handoff to r-implement.

Quick Start

Ask me to start the implementation workflow by selecting a stage (Stage 1, Stage 2, or Stage 3) and I will guide you through drafting, reviewing, or resolving the plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about implementation-workflow

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I coordinate an implementation lifecycle from spec to decisions log?▼

An implementation lifecycle coordinates drafting plans from finalized specs, performing adversarial reviews, and logging decisions. This workflow routes through three stages—draft, review, and resolve—to produce auditable artifacts for downstream handoff.

What is an adversarial review in software implementation planning?▼

An adversarial review challenges a drafted implementation plan to identify flaws and gaps before resolution. It acts as the second stage in a plan-driven development workflow, rigorously testing the plan before finalizing decisions and handing off to implementation.

How do I start a staged planning workflow for a new implementation?▼

Start a staged planning workflow by selecting a stage: Stage 1 drafts the implementation plan, Stage 2 conducts the adversarial review, and Stage 3 resolves issues while logging decisions. Stage-routing prompts guide you to the appropriate phase.

Does this implementation workflow require a finalized spec before drafting?▼

Yes, the implementation workflow requires a finalized spec to begin drafting. The lifecycle is designed for plan-driven development contexts that require staged planning, rigorous review, and auditable decisions across multiple stages.

Best way to maintain an auditable decisions log during implementation?▼

Maintain an auditable decisions log by resolving adversarial review findings through a structured stage. The resolve stage outputs a formal decisions log, capturing governance details and handoff instructions for downstream workstreams.

When should I not use a three-stage implementation workflow?▼

Avoid a three-stage implementation workflow for rapid prototyping or informal tasks lacking rigorous review needs. This approach targets plan-driven development requiring staged planning, adversarial reviews, and auditable decisions across multiple stages.