implementation-workflow

An implementation lifecycle coordinates drafting plans from finalized specs, performing adversarial reviews, and logging decisions. This workflow routes through three stages—draft, review, and resolve—to produce auditable artifacts for downstream handoff.

An adversarial review challenges a drafted implementation plan to identify flaws and gaps before resolution. It acts as the second stage in a plan-driven development workflow, rigorously testing the plan before finalizing decisions and handing off to implementation.

Start a staged planning workflow by selecting a stage: Stage 1 drafts the implementation plan, Stage 2 conducts the adversarial review, and Stage 3 resolves issues while logging decisions. Stage-routing prompts guide you to the appropriate phase.

Yes, the implementation workflow requires a finalized spec to begin drafting. The lifecycle is designed for plan-driven development contexts that require staged planning, rigorous review, and auditable decisions across multiple stages.

Maintain an auditable decisions log by resolving adversarial review findings through a structured stage. The resolve stage outputs a formal decisions log, capturing governance details and handoff instructions for downstream workstreams.

Avoid a three-stage implementation workflow for rapid prototyping or informal tasks lacking rigorous review needs. This approach targets plan-driven development requiring staged planning, adversarial reviews, and auditable decisions across multiple stages.