improve-codebase-architecture

To find high-leverage architecture refactors, scan your repository for modules, boundaries, and call paths to identify concrete opportunities that reduce caller burden and tighten invariants without making code changes.

The best way to reduce caller burden is to run a planning-only repository scan that evaluates modules and call paths against your coding standards, returning ranked refactor candidates that target high-friction boundaries.

Yes, you can scan the repository to evaluate runtime seams and test interfaces against testing standards, isolating specific architectural friction points that make modules difficult to extend or validate.

No, architecture refactor analysis is planning-only and generates no code changes, tests, or implementation specs, focusing strictly on producing a ranked list of refactor opportunities and recommended next steps to explore.

You need an evidence-based architecture scan when a module feels hard to extend and you want to isolate the exact friction points using concrete files, call paths, and interface evidence rather than vague cleanup ideas.

To align refactoring candidates with coding standards, the scan loads your design, boundaries, error-handling, and testing standards before evaluating code areas, ensuring that identified refactor opportunities are backed by shared guidelines.