improve-codebase-architecture

Identify shallow, tightly-coupled modules for consolidation aligned with ADRs and domain glossary.

10|2|Updated Dec 29, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sumpalabs/petrodb --skill improve-codebase-architecture-sumpalabs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: improve-codebase-architecture
Source: https://github.com/sumpalabs/petrodb/tree/main/.agents/skills/improve-codebase-architecture
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sumpalabs/petrodb --skill improve-codebase-architecture-sumpalabs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill eliminates the friction of working with fragmented, shallow codebases where small, tightly-coupled modules leak implementation details, are hard to test in isolation, and require bouncing between dozens of files to understand or modify a single business concept.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Deepening Opportunity Identification: Scans your codebase to find shallow modules where the interface is nearly as complex as the implementation, and proposes consolidations that turn them into deep modules with high leverage.
  • ADR & Domain-Aligned Recommendations: Uses your project's existing Architecture Decision Records and domain glossary to ensure proposed refactors don't contradict prior agreed-upon design choices, avoiding wasted effort on re-litigating resolved decisions.
  • Use Case: For engineering teams struggling with untestable, tightly-coupled code that requires jumping between 10+ files to modify a single business rule, this skill surfaces the highest-impact refactors to consolidate logic, reduce test duplication, and make the codebase easier for both humans and AI to navigate.

Quick Start

Use the improve-codebase-architecture skill to analyze the current codebase and list the top 3 deepening opportunities that would improve testability and reduce coupling, aligned with the project's existing ADRs and domain language.

Frequently Asked Questions about improve-codebase-architecture

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify shallow modules in my codebase that need refactoring?

Shallow modules where the interface complexity nearly matches the implementation are identified by scanning for tightly-coupled code that leaks implementation details and creates maintenance friction. The analysis surfaces consolidation opportunities to turn them into deep, high-leverage modules.

How can I improve codebase testability when tightly-coupled logic requires jumping between many files?

Improving testability involves consolidating fragmented logic that requires bouncing between 10+ files to modify a single business rule. The analysis surfaces refactors that reduce interface complexity, concentrate change locality, and eliminate test duplication caused by shallow modules.

How do I ensure proposed codebase refactors align with existing Architecture Decision Records?

Refactor recommendations are aligned with existing Architecture Decision Records and the project's domain glossary to avoid re-litigating resolved design choices. This ensures proposed consolidations respect prior agreed-upon architectural decisions and domain language.

What is the best way to reduce interface complexity in a fragmented codebase?

The best way to reduce interface complexity is identifying deepening opportunities where shallow modules can be consolidated. This turns tightly-coupled modules with high maintenance friction into deep modules with high leverage and reduced testing overhead.

Do I need a domain glossary and Architecture Decision Records to analyze codebase architecture?

Yes, this analysis is designed for software engineering workflows involving projects with existing domain glossaries and architecture decision records. These inputs ensure refactoring recommendations align with prior documented architectural decisions and domain language.

When should I avoid consolidating shallow modules in my codebase?

You should avoid consolidating shallow modules when the proposed refactor contradicts prior agreed-upon design choices documented in Architecture Decision Records. The analysis specifically avoids re-litigating resolved decisions to prevent wasted effort on incompatible architectural changes.