improve-lean-optimums

Diagnose Lean4-calculated metric range deviations using formal proofs.

1|Updated Jul 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Tyler-R-Kendrick/slm-training --skill improve-lean-optimums
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: improve-lean-optimums
Source: https://github.com/Tyler-R-Kendrick/slm-training/tree/main/.agents/skills/improve-lean-optimums
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Tyler-R-Kendrick/slm-training --skill improve-lean-optimums

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the challenge of maintaining rigorous research standards when model performance metrics fall outside of preregistered, Lean4-verified bands.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Certified Metric Verification: Replays metric certificates against formal Lean4 proofs to ensure data integrity.
  • Tiered Disposition Logic: Provides a structured framework for deciding whether to continue, stop, or block model promotion based on formal evidence.
  • Hypothesis-Driven Diagnosis: Guides the user through five specific diagnosis lanes (measurement, training, architecture, model, assumptions) to ensure evidence-based improvements.

Quick Start

Use the improve-lean-optimums skill to verify the latest metric certificate and diagnose the cause of the current band miss.

Frequently Asked Questions about improve-lean-optimums

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify model training metrics against Lean4 formal proofs?

Verify model training metrics against Lean4 formal proofs by replaying metric certificates to confirm data integrity and adherence to theorem-backed performance gates. This validates that observations satisfy preregistered bands.

What is the best way to diagnose model performance when metrics fall outside preregistered bands?

Diagnosing model performance when metrics miss preregistered bands involves a hypothesis-driven framework exploring five specific lanes: measurement, training, architecture, model, and assumptions. This ensures evidence-based improvements grounded in formal verification.

Do I need a Lean4 theorem prover environment to run formal verification on training metrics?

Yes, you need a Lean4 theorem prover environment and local Python-based metric verification scripts. These dependencies ensure architectural and mathematical consistency when validating metric certificates for formal research campaigns.

How do I decide whether to block or continue model promotion based on formal evidence?

Decide whether to continue, stop, or block model promotion using tiered disposition logic based on formal evidence. This framework evaluates verified metric certificates to determine if performance strictly meets theorem-backed gates.

Why does formal metric verification fail when evaluation observations deviate from Lean4-calculated ranges?

Formal metric verification fails when evaluation observations deviate from Lean4-calculated ranges because the metric certificates no longer mathematically satisfy the preregistered theorem-backed bands. The skill refines these ranges and diagnoses the underlying cause across five specific lanes.