incremental-build

Diagnose MSBuild target re-execution from binlogs and fix incremental build conditions.

1|Updated May 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/1k-off/umbraco-observability-playground --skill incremental-build-1k-off
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: incremental-build
Source: https://github.com/1k-off/umbraco-observability-playground/tree/main/.agents/skills/incremental-build
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/1k-off/umbraco-observability-playground --skill incremental-build-1k-off

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Incremental builds often get slower than expected because MSBuild runs targets that should be skipped, wasting developer time and CI cycles.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Identify why targets re-execute by interpreting binlog messages like “Building target completely” versus “Skipping target”.
  • Fix unnecessary rebuild triggers by ensuring custom targets declare correct and stable Inputs/Outputs, avoid volatile output paths, and register generated files via FileWrites.
  • Diagnose environment-specific behavior such as Visual Studio Fast Up-to-Date Check (FUTDC) differences between IDE and command-line builds.
  • Typical use case: you run dotnet build twice and observe that the second build still recompiles large portions of the project, indicating missing or incorrect incremental metadata in custom targets or file generation steps.

Quick Start

Ask the skill to diagnose an unexpected no-op rebuild by guiding you to capture two binlogs and explain which inputs caused the “out of date” targets.

Frequently Asked Questions about incremental-build

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
Why does MSBuild rebuild targets that should be skipped during an incremental build?

MSBuild rebuilds targets unnecessarily during an incremental build when custom targets declare incorrect Inputs/Outputs, use volatile output paths, or fail to register generated files via FileWrites, causing timestamp checks to fail.

How do I diagnose unnecessary MSBuild rebuilds using binlog files?

To diagnose unnecessary MSBuild rebuilds, capture two binlog files and interpret the build messages to identify which targets show "Building target completely" instead of "Skipping target", revealing the specific inputs causing the out-of-date condition.

How do I fix custom MSBuild targets so they skip correctly during incremental builds?

Fix custom MSBuild targets for incremental builds by declaring stable Inputs/Outputs, avoiding volatile output paths, registering generated files via FileWrites, and verifying incremental target conditions to ensure proper timestamp-based skipping.

Does Visual Studio Fast Up-to-Date Check behave differently from command-line MSBuild incremental builds?

Yes, Visual Studio Fast Up-to-Date Check (FUTDC) can differ from command-line MSBuild incremental builds, requiring environment-specific diagnosis to identify why targets re-execute in the IDE but skip correctly in command-line builds.

What is the best way to stop dotnet build from recompiling large portions of a project on the second build?

The best way to stop dotnet build from recompiling is to analyze the binlog for targets running instead of being skipped, then correct the incremental metadata by ensuring stable output paths and proper FileWrites registration.

When should I not rely on MSBuild incremental build behavior for custom file generation targets?

You should not rely on MSBuild incremental build behavior when custom file generation targets use unstable output paths or lack proper FileWrites registration, as these prevent the build system from correctly determining if inputs have changed.