ingest-feedback

Iron-rule checks evaluate development-skills feedback by challenging each suggestion against defined safety and quality constraints, filtering out unvetted recommendations, and documenting the rationale for accepting or rejecting each change.

Filtering unsafe recommendations requires an evaluation pipeline that applies rule-driven constraints to each feedback suggestion, producing a cleaned list of vetted fixes that meet safety and quality standards.

Generate an evidence-based assessment report by ingesting the feedback file and running an evaluation pipeline that highlights friction points, documents rationale, and outputs a structured set of recommended actions.

Yes, you can moderate development-skills feedback reports by providing the file path as an argument and running an evaluation pipeline that applies Iron Rules to ensure only validated changes are adopted.

Using iron-rule checks for feedback ingestion restricts adoption to suggestions meeting predefined constraints, meaning any valid recommendation failing these specific rule checks will be filtered out and require manual review.