inkos-story-review

Reviews story chapters against genre-specific standards and reports issues with evidence and severity.

9.4k|1.8k|Updated Mar 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Narcooo/inkos --skill inkos-story-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: inkos-story-review
Source: https://github.com/Narcooo/inkos/tree/main/packages/core/skills/inkos-story-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Narcooo/inkos --skill inkos-story-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Reviewing fiction manuscripts consistently is hard: different genres, audiences, and platforms demand different standards, and vague feedback makes revision guesswork. This Skill diagnoses chapters and manuscripts with transparent, genre-aware criteria so every issue comes with evidence, severity, and a repair direction.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adaptive Review Standards: Selects review criteria based on genre, target audience, tone, platform, and explicit user preference instead of applying one universal threshold.
  • Evidence-Based Issue Reports: Shows concrete issue descriptions, severity, textual evidence, and likely reader impact for each finding.
  • Controlled Revision Workflow: Distinguishes audit failures from prose defects, revises only when requested or authorized, and preserves the author's voice and successful passages.
  • Use Case: A web novelist asks for a review of the latest serialized chapter; the Skill audits it against commercial-serial continuation standards, flags a causality gap with quoted evidence, and proposes a minimal fix.

Quick Start

Review the latest chapter of my current book against its genre standards and list each issue with severity, evidence, and a suggested fix.

Frequently Asked Questions about inkos-story-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a novel chapter with consistent criteria?

Request a review of the chapter and the Skill first derives the applicable standard from genre, target audience, tone, platform, and your stated preferences. It then reports each issue with severity, evidence, and likely reader impact rather than applying one generic threshold.

What does a story review report include?

Each blocking issue includes a concrete description, severity level, quoted evidence from the text, likely reader impact, and a repair direction. Objective contradictions are separated from taste preferences so you can decide what to act on.

Does the review standard differ between genres like mystery and comedy?

Yes, the review matrix adapts per form: mystery requires evidence visibility and fair inference, romance prioritizes emotional credibility, and comedy accepts exaggeration when setup and character logic support it. Commercial serials are judged on continuation pressure plus scene completeness.

Will the review rewrite my chapter automatically?

No, revision happens only when you explicitly ask or when the confirmed workflow authorizes it. A failed audit alone is not treated as proof the prose is bad, and revisions preserve your voice and successful passages with the smallest effective scope.

What happens when the audit parser fails on a chapter?

A parser or model-format failure is recorded as an audit failure, not as evidence of bad prose. The Skill reports the failure honestly instead of fabricating issues or rewriting the chapter without cause.