inner-flame

Automate multi-layer self-review to prevent premature task completion in Rune.

6|3|Updated Feb 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/vinhnxv/rune-plugin --skill inner-flame
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: inner-flame
Source: https://github.com/vinhnxv/rune-plugin/tree/main/plugins/rune/skills/inner-flame
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/vinhnxv/rune-plugin --skill inner-flame

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The Inner Flame establishes a rigorous, role-adapted self-review that prevents premature task completion by enforcing evidence-backed validation and multi-layer checks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Grounding checks to prevent hallucination and ensure sources are read.
  • Completeness & correctness checks across worker, fixer, reviewer, and researcher roles.
  • Self-adversarial review to surface weak findings and improve reliability.
  • Use cases include validating any task before sealing in Rune's workflow, ensuring traceable evidence and adherence to protocol.

Quick Start

Run the Inner Flame self-review protocol on the task you are about to seal.

Frequently Asked Questions about inner-flame

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I prevent premature task completion in automated code workflows?

To prevent premature task completion, apply a structured self-review protocol enforcing evidence-backed validation and multi-layer checks before sealing any task. This ensures outputs are grounded, complete, and verified against fresh evidence.

What is grounding in self-review and when do I need it?

Grounding in self-review is a validation mechanism that prevents hallucination by ensuring sources are actually read and referenced. You need this process when traceable evidence and strict adherence to protocol are required for task reliability.

How do I perform self-adversarial review for software engineering tasks?

Perform self-adversarial review by running role-adapted checks across worker, fixer, reviewer, and researcher roles to surface weak findings. This structured process improves reliability by challenging conclusions during the execution and seal phases.

Can I use role-adapted checks for different project phases?

Yes, role-adapted checks can be applied across worker, fixer, reviewer, and researcher roles during planning, execution, and seal phases. This ensures completeness and correctness validations are tailored to the specific responsibilities of each role.

What is the best way to validate task completeness before sealing?

The best way to validate task completeness before sealing is implementing a three-layer review protocol: Grounding, Completeness, and Self-Adversarial. This multi-layer approach enforces fresh-evidence governance and produces seal-ready outputs.

Why does my automated task output lack traceable evidence?

Automated task output lacks traceable evidence when a rigorous self-review protocol is not enforced. Implementing grounding checks ensures sources are read and referenced, preventing hallucination and guaranteeing adherence to protocol.