inno-rebuttal

Automate rebuttal planning and drafting for conference reviews.

1.0k|117|Updated Feb 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/OpenLAIR/dr-claw --skill inno-rebuttal
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: inno-rebuttal
Source: https://github.com/OpenLAIR/dr-claw/tree/main/skills/inno-rebuttal
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/OpenLAIR/dr-claw --skill inno-rebuttal

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Drafting and refining academic rebuttals for conference reviews is time-consuming and error-prone. This Skill provides a guided, repeatable workflow to parse reviewer feedback, extract actionable items, map them to response strategies, and generate evidence-backed rebuttal drafts that align with venue policies.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Stage-based rebuttal workflow: captures each concern, classifies its impact, and routes it to a targeted response plan.
  • Issue Board and strategy planning: tracks cross-reviewer concerns, enabling consistent global replies and per-review responses.
  • Task synthesis and draft artifacts: produces per-review responses, integrated evidence maps, and a revision plan for the manuscript.
  • Venue-aware formatting and safety: respects double-blinding, confidentiality where required, and platform-specific rebuttal formats.

Quick Start

Paste the reviewer comments and specify the target venue; the skill will generate an initial Issue Board and a draft outline.

Frequently Asked Questions about inno-rebuttal

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write an academic rebuttal for conference reviews with multiple reviewers?

Automate academic rebuttal drafting by pasting reviewer comments and specifying the target venue. The skill parses multi-reviewer feedback into an Issue Board, classifies concerns, and generates paste-ready response drafts aligned with venue policies.

Can I use this for rolling reviews and OpenReview platforms?

Yes, the rebuttal workflow supports rolling reviews and OpenReview platforms. It applies venue-aware formatting, respects double-blinding confidentiality requirements, and generates artifacts matching platform-specific rebuttal formats.

What is the best way to track cross-reviewer concerns and plan a response strategy?

Build an Issue Board to track cross-reviewer concerns and plan response strategies. The workflow captures each concern, classifies its impact, routes it to a targeted response plan, and enables consistent global replies and per-review responses.

How do I generate a revision plan for my manuscript from reviewer feedback?

Generate a manuscript revision plan by synthesizing reviewer feedback into actionable tasks. The workflow produces per-review responses, integrated evidence maps with provenance tracking, and a structured revision plan for your manuscript.

Does the rebuttal workflow handle double-blinding and confidentiality rules?

Yes, the workflow enforces venue-aware safety by respecting double-blinding and confidentiality rules where required. It formats rebuttals according to specific venue policies and platform constraints.

What is the difference between paste-ready and extended rebuttal drafts?

The skill produces both paste-ready rebuttal drafts for direct submission and extended drafts with detailed evidence maps and provenance tracking. Both formats align with venue rules while offering different levels of response detail.