inno-reference-audit

You can verify academic citations by validating DOIs, arXiv IDs, and titles against trusted sources like CrossRef and Semantic Scholar. This process matches metadata including title, authors, and year with tolerance, flagging discrepancies for manual review.

The best way to validate arXiv IDs and DOIs is by querying CrossRef, arXiv, and Semantic Scholar to locate exact sources. This approach validates existence, matches metadata with tolerance, and produces a structured verification report with source confidence.

During a reference audit, citation verification handles metadata discrepancies by matching titles, authors, and years with tolerance against source databases. When mismatches occur, the system flags these discrepancies for manual review rather than automatically rejecting the reference.

You can use Semantic Scholar and CrossRef to audit references without exact DOIs by leveraging titles and other metadata. The verification workflow queries these trusted sources to locate the exact source and validate existence even when DOIs are missing.

Yes, bibtexparser works with automated reference verification workflows by parsing BibTeX files to extract citation entries. These extracted references are then systematically checked against arXiv, CrossRef, and Semantic Scholar to generate a concise, traceable audit report.

Limitations of automated citation verification include relying on the coverage of CrossRef, arXiv, and Semantic Scholar, meaning unindexed sources may be flagged as discrepancies requiring manual review. It validates metadata existence but cannot assess the qualitative accuracy of the citation context.