insecure-defaults

Detect fail-open security vulnerabilities like hardcoded secrets and weak crypto.

1|Updated Jul 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AidenSbVevo/claude-code-starter --skill insecure-defaults-aidensbvevo
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: insecure-defaults
Source: https://github.com/AidenSbVevo/claude-code-starter/tree/main/skills/tob-insecure-defaults/skills/insecure-defaults
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AidenSbVevo/claude-code-starter --skill insecure-defaults-aidensbvevo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill identifies critical fail-open vulnerabilities where applications run with insecure default configurations, such as hardcoded secrets or disabled authentication, which could lead to production compromises.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Vulnerability Detection: Scans for hardcoded credentials, weak crypto, and permissive access controls.
  • Behavioral Analysis: Distinguishes between dangerous fail-open patterns and safe fail-secure implementations.
  • Use Case: During a security audit, use this Skill to verify that your application crashes safely when environment variables are missing, rather than falling back to insecure hardcoded defaults.

Quick Start

Use the insecure-defaults skill to audit the current project for hardcoded secrets and fail-open configuration patterns.

Frequently Asked Questions about insecure-defaults

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I detect fail-open security vulnerabilities in my application configuration?

Detecting fail-open security vulnerabilities requires static analysis of environment variable handling and runtime code path tracing to identify hardcoded secrets, weak crypto, and permissive access controls that trigger insecure defaults when configurations are missing.

How does fail-open behavior differ from fail-secure implementations during a security audit?

Fail-open behavior occurs when missing environment variables cause applications to fall back to insecure hardcoded defaults or disabled authentication, whereas fail-secure implementations crash safely, preventing production compromises by denying access when configuration is incomplete.

How do I audit my codebase for hardcoded secrets and weak cryptographic algorithms?

Auditing for hardcoded secrets and weak cryptographic algorithms involves scanning configuration management files and tracing runtime code paths to verify whether applications use insecure default configurations or permissive access controls that could lead to production compromises.

Can I use static analysis to verify environment variable handling for production-readiness assessments?

Static analysis can verify environment variable handling for production-readiness assessments by tracing runtime code paths to confirm applications do not fall back to insecure hardcoded defaults, ensuring fail-secure behavior when required configuration variables are missing.

What are the limitations of tracing runtime code paths to find permissive access controls?

Tracing runtime code paths to find permissive access controls is limited by the complexity of confirming production impact, requiring thorough static analysis of environment variable handling to accurately distinguish dangerous fail-open patterns from safe fail-secure implementations.