intake-audit

Audits patent disclosure materials and classifies technical facts before drafting claims.

2|Updated Aug 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/DeepJH/doubao-skill-and-info --skill intake-audit-deepjh
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: intake-audit
Source: https://github.com/DeepJH/doubao-skill-and-info/tree/main/skills/doubao-patent-drafting/sub-skills/intake-audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/DeepJH/doubao-skill-and-info --skill intake-audit-deepjh

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Patent drafting often fails because disclosure materials contain unverified claims, missing parameters, or ambiguous values that get silently written into claims. This Skill performs a structured pre-drafting audit of invention disclosure materials so that every technical fact is verified, classified, and assigned a destination before any claim is written. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Seven-Element Inventory: Checks technical field, background, problem, solution, effect, drawings, and test data, marking each as present, partial, or missing, and flags off-the-shelf technology that cannot enter independent claims. - A/B/C/D Fact Grading: Classifies every technical statement as tested fact, disclosed solution, unverified expectation, or missing item, with conservative downgrading when classification is uncertain. - Ambiguity and Overclaim Scanning: Detects same-unit values with different meanings, absolute wording unsupported by data, and registers drawing status with planned figure lists and suggested reference numerals. - Use Case: A patent agent receives an inventor's disclosure for a battery pack venting structure and uses this audit to produce an internal checklist separating measured data from design targets before drafting claims. ## Quick Start Audit the attached invention disclosure materials and produce a fact-grading table with confirmation items before drafting the patent application.

Frequently Asked Questions about intake-audit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit invention disclosure materials before drafting patent claims?

Inventory seven elements (field, background, problem, solution, effect, drawings, test data), then grade each technical statement as tested fact, disclosed solution, unverified expectation, or missing item. Register missing items as confirmation questions instead of filling gaps with common knowledge.

What is A/B/C/D fact grading in patent drafting?

It classifies disclosure content by verification status: A is tested data with concrete values, B is disclosed solutions without test data, C is unverified design expectations, and D is missing information needing confirmation. When uncertain, always downgrade to the stricter level.

Can off-the-shelf technology be included in independent patent claims?

No. Existing algorithms, open-source frameworks, and standard purchased parts identified in the disclosure can only appear in background or implementation details. They cannot be essential features of independent claims, and their inherent effects cannot be claimed as the application's benefits.

What should I do when a patent disclosure has no drawings?

Create a planned figure list with suggested reference numerals, write the specification referencing those planned figures, and add a statement that formal drawings await the applicant. Never reference figures that do not exist without this declaration.

How do I handle absolute claims like 'completely eliminates' in disclosures?

Compare the absolute wording against the actual data provided. If the data only supports a relative improvement, rewrite the statement to match the data, such as changing 'completely blocks flame spread' to 'significantly reduces flame length', and record the revision.