Verified:GitHub

intake_verify

Automates four-step verification of notes and claims to output a verdict.

1|Updated Apr 16, 2026

Search Tags:#verification #evidence #critical-thinking #source-evaluation #claims-verification #information-assessment #notes-review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/JoNaYeon/claude-code-skills --skill intake-verify

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: intake_verify
Source: https://github.com/JoNaYeon/claude-code-skills/tree/main/intake/intake_verify
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/JoNaYeon/claude-code-skills --skill intake-verify

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

기존 노트나 특정 주장의 신뢰성을 4단계로 검증하고, 체계적으로 판단을 돕습니다.

Core Features & Use Cases

1차 출처 정보의 신뢰성 평가, 2차/3차 출처의 맥락 분석
주장/노트 관련 근거의 명료한 정합성 확인과 증거 등급화
기존 정보에 대한 반대 시나리오 제시 및 적용성 판단

Quick Start

Provide a four-step critical verification for the given note or claim.

Frequently Asked Questions about intake_verify

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I verify the trustworthiness of claims and notes from multiple sources?▼

Source evaluation assesses the reliability of primary, secondary, and tertiary sources by analyzing their context and credibility. This mechanism ensures that foundational information is trustworthy before proceeding with deeper evidence validation.

What is the best way to check if existing notes have sufficient supporting evidence?▼

Checking existing notes requires evidence validation, which clarifies the logical consistency of supporting evidence and assigns evidence grades. This process determines whether the claims hold up under structured critical-thinking assessment.

How do I perform a step-by-step critical assessment of a specific claim?▼

Perform a step-by-step critical assessment by executing source validation, evidence validation, counter-scenario generation, and applicability analysis. This four-step verification process outputs a formal, justified verdict on the claim's reliability.

Can I use this verification framework to evaluate secondary and tertiary source contexts?▼

Yes, you can evaluate secondary and tertiary source contexts using this framework. The source validation step specifically analyzes contextual reliability across primary, secondary, and tertiary information layers to determine overall trustworthiness.

When should I construct a counter-scenario during information assessment?▼

You should construct a counter-scenario during the third step of information assessment to test the robustness of the original claim. Presenting alternative scenarios helps determine if the initial evidence holds up against contradictory possibilities before finalizing the verdict.