internal-investigation

Maintain structured logs of allegations, evidence, sources, and conflicts for internal investigations.

109|20|Updated Mar 7, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/stakwork/stakgraph --skill internal-investigation-stakwork
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: internal-investigation
Source: https://github.com/stakwork/stakgraph/tree/main/mcp/skills/employment-legal/internal-investigation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/stakwork/stakgraph --skill internal-investigation-stakwork

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill organizes internal investigations so attorneys can maintain a structured, privileged record, identify evidence gaps, evaluate conflicting accounts, and produce defensible work products without losing track of sources or procedural safeguards.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Investigation Intake: Open a matter with allegations, parties, timeframe, investigation type, privilege considerations, and tailored source checklists.
  • Evidence Management: Process interviews, attorney notes, and document batches using explicit pull criteria, significance ratings, contradiction tracking, corroboration links, and evidentiary gap logs.
  • Querying and Reporting: Answer factual, conflict, coverage, strength, and Upjohn-warning questions from the investigation log, then draft or update privileged memoranda and audience-specific summaries.
  • Use Case: Use this Skill to review an employment complaint, track interviews and supporting documents, identify unresolved evidence gaps, and prepare a preliminary investigation memo for attorney review.

Quick Start

Use the internal-investigation skill to open a new attorney-directed investigation, create its source checklist, and record the allegation, parties, timeframe, and investigation type.

Frequently Asked Questions about internal-investigation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I manage evidence tracking and witness interviews during an internal employment investigation?

Internal investigation management involves maintaining a privileged log of allegations, evidence sources, and conflicts to identify evidentiary gaps. It applies to harassment, discrimination, retaliation, and executive misconduct cases requiring Upjohn safeguards and source coverage tracking.

How do I draft a privileged investigation memo from interview notes and document review?

Drafting a privileged investigation memo requires querying a structured log for factual conflicts, evidentiary gaps, and source coverage. The resulting work-product outputs provide defensible audience-specific summaries for attorney review and consequential-action decisions.

Can I track conflicting witness accounts and evidentiary gaps in employment law cases?

Yes, you can track conflicting witness accounts and evidentiary gaps by logging contradiction tracking and corroboration links during interview processing and document review. This identifies unresolved evidentiary gaps before preparing external responses.

What is the best way to structure an internal investigation from intake to final memo?

The best way to structure an internal investigation is to open a matter with allegations, parties, timeframe, and investigation type, then process evidence using significance ratings and contradiction tracking to produce a defensible final memo.

When do I need Upjohn warnings and privilege safeguards in an internal investigation?

Upjohn warnings and privilege safeguards are required when conducting attorney-directed internal investigations involving witness interviews and document review. These protections maintain the structured privileged record necessary for employment, whistleblower, and executive misconduct matters.

Does this approach to internal investigations work for whistleblower claims and financial misconduct?

Yes, this approach works for whistleblower claims and financial misconduct by applying matter-specific context, privilege considerations, and tailored source checklists. It tracks evidentiary gaps and manages consequential-action reviews before issuing external responses.