interview

To validate project assumptions, you can use structured branching questions that drill down into your plan's decision tree, tracking dependencies and surfacing gaps to reach a shared understanding with stakeholders.

Stress-testing a design plan requires guided, branching interviews that challenge decisions and dependencies, ensuring stakeholders clarify rationale and track next steps to uncover hidden risks.

Using a decision tree to identify risks involves applying branching interview flows that drill into each decision node, tracking dependencies between requirements to expose gaps and validate assumptions.

Yes, you can resolve dependencies between project requirements by applying a structured interview flow that identifies and tracks connections between decisions, requirements, and risks across the plan.

Plan validation works across both design and project scopes, applying guided questioning to challenge decisions and dependencies regardless of the specific planning context.

You should avoid using a branching interview flow when your plan lacks complex decision trees or interdependent requirements, as simple plans may not require relentless questioning to surface gaps.