skills.rest
zivtech
zivtechOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

interview-critic

Analyze JTBD interview transcripts for methodological rigor and interviewer bias.

Updated Mar 5, 2026
Search Tags:#research#interview#synthesis#critique#jtbd#four-forces
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zivtech/joyus-desktop --skill interview-critic
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: interview-critic
Source: https://github.com/zivtech/joyus-desktop/tree/main/.claude/skills/interview-critic
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zivtech/joyus-desktop --skill interview-critic

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the risk of relying on flawed interview data by providing an independent, objective critique of JTBD switching-story transcripts to ensure they are grounded in evidence rather than interviewer bias.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Methodological Rigor: Evaluates Four Forces coverage and identifies leading questions or affirmations that may have corrupted the data.
  • Quality Scoring: Provides an independent 1-5 quality score to verify the interviewer's self-assessment.
  • Use Case: Before presenting synthesis findings to stakeholders, use this Skill to verify that the job statement is solution-agnostic and supported by direct participant evidence.

Quick Start

Use the interview-critic skill to review the attached JTBD transcript and provide a quality score and validity assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions about interview-critic

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate a JTBD interview transcript for methodological rigor?▼

Evaluating JTBD interview rigor involves checking Four Forces coverage, identifying leading questions, and verifying that job statements are solution-agnostic and grounded in direct participant evidence.

What is the Four Forces framework in product research interviews?▼

The Four Forces framework evaluates push of current situation, pull of new solution, anxiety of switching, and habit inertia. Assessing JTBD transcripts for this coverage prevents incomplete research synthesis.

How do I identify interviewer bias in JTBD switching story transcripts?▼

Interviewer bias in JTBD transcripts is identified by detecting leading questions or affirmations that corrupt participant data. An independent critique separates actual switching-story evidence from interviewer influence.

How do I score the quality of a JTBD research interview?▼

Scoring JTBD interview quality involves assigning a 1-5 rating based on methodological rigor, Four Forces coverage, and evidence grounding. This independent score verifies the interviewer's self-assessment for data integrity.

Can I use an automated critique tool to check if my job statement is solution-agnostic?▼

An automated critique tool validates whether job statements are solution-agnostic by analyzing interview transcripts for evidence grounding. It ensures statements rely on direct participant data rather than solution-specific assumptions.

When should I critique JTBD interview data before product synthesis?▼

JTBD interview data should be critiqued before presenting synthesis findings to stakeholders. Validating methodological rigor and data integrity beforehand prevents flawed research from influencing downstream product decisions.

Related Skills

Explore More Product & Management Skills→
slgoodrichslgoodrich
121

interview-frameworks

Design structured interview guides with Mom Test, 5 Whys, and JTBD framing.

Community
Basic
v1bh0rv1bh0r

nw-jtbd-interviews

Extract Four Forces and job dimensions from JTBD discovery interviews.

Community
Advanced
argenargen
1

jobs-to-be-done

Guide users through customer research to produce evidence-anchored JTBD statements.

Community
Intermediate
shanelindsayshanelindsay
2

scientific-critical-thinking

Critique scientific claims for rigor, bias, and evidential quality.

Community
Advanced