inverse

Challenge proposal assumptions by arguing opposing positions to surface weaknesses.

15|2|Updated Feb 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jdonohoo/vern-bot --skill inverse
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: inverse
Source: https://github.com/jdonohoo/vern-bot/tree/main/skills/inverse
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jdonohoo/vern-bot --skill inverse

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Inverse Vern helps teams avoid groupthink by challenging consensus and surfacing rigorous counterpoints.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Acts as a professional devil's advocate to rigorously test proposals.
  • Identifies hidden assumptions and reveals potential failure modes.
  • Useful in strategy reviews, product design, retrospective critiques, and meetings.

Quick Start

Provide a proposal and ask it to identify assumptions, argue the opposite, and surface weaknesses.

Frequently Asked Questions about inverse

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I challenge assumptions in a proposal to prevent groupthink?

To challenge assumptions and prevent groupthink, apply a contrarian workflow that reads the proposal, identifies hidden assumptions, and argues the opposite to surface potential failure modes.

What is a devil's advocate approach for strategy and product design reviews?

A devil's advocate approach for strategy reviews rigorously tests alternative paths by identifying assumptions, arguing opposing positions, and surfacing merit in counterpoints to strengthen the original product design.

How do I identify hidden assumptions and failure modes in a strategy proposal?

Identify hidden assumptions and failure modes by providing the strategy proposal to a critical-thinking workflow that reads the idea, tests alternative paths, and argues the opposite to reveal weaknesses.

Can I use critical-thinking consensus-challenge workflows for retrospective critiques?

Yes, you can use consensus-challenge workflows for retrospective critiques and meetings. They rigorously test proposals by surfacing counterpoints and revealing potential failure modes in team strategies.

When should I not use a contrarian argumentation approach for proposal analysis?

Avoid using a contrarian argumentation approach when a proposal requires rapid consensus without debate, as the inverse workflow deliberately challenges consensus and argues opposite positions to surface weaknesses.