skills.rest
tblakex01
tblakex01COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

investigate

Guide users through four debugging phases to uncover root causes.

1|Updated Apr 26, 2026
Search Tags:#workflow#debugging#troubleshooting#investigate#root-cause#gstack
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tblakex01/conductor-playground --skill investigate-tblakex01
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: investigate
Source: https://github.com/tblakex01/conductor-playground/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/investigate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tblakex01/conductor-playground --skill investigate-tblakex01

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Systematic debugging with root-cause investigation. Four phases: investigate, analyze, hypothesize, implement. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", or "root cause analysis".

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Guided four-phase workflow to identify and confirm root causes before fixes.
  • Tool-agnostic debugging prompts that integrate with common developer workflows.
  • Use Case: When an error occurs or a bug regresses, run this skill to trace the issue and craft a verified fix plan.

Quick Start

Start by initiating the four-phase root-cause investigation to identify the underlying cause before proposing a fix.

Frequently Asked Questions about investigate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform root-cause debugging for recurring software bugs?▼

Root-cause debugging requires a systematic four-phase workflow—investigate, analyze, hypothesize, implement—to trace underlying causes before applying fixes. This guided process enforces an iron law of no fixes without root cause identification, ensuring bugs are permanently resolved.

What is the best way to troubleshoot unexpected software failures and errors?▼

Troubleshooting unexpected failures works best by following guided debugging prompts through four phases: investigate, analyze, hypothesize, and implement. This tool-agnostic approach integrates with common developer workflows to trace issues and craft verified fix plans.

Why should I use a systematic debugging workflow instead of patching broken behavior directly?▼

A systematic debugging workflow stops recurring bugs by enforcing root-cause analysis before any fixes are implemented. Patching broken behavior directly without identifying the underlying cause often leads to regressions, whereas this auditable process guarantees verified fixes.

Can I use this guided debugging process across different software projects and environments?▼

Yes, this guided debugging process works across software projects and environments when users report errors, broken behavior, or unexpected failures. It uses tool-agnostic debugging prompts that integrate with common developer workflows to enable reproducible root-cause analysis.

What are the limitations of applying fixes without root-cause analysis?▼

Applying fixes without root-cause analysis often results in recurring bugs and regressions. This systematic approach enforces an iron law against fixing without identifying the root cause, requiring clear process steps, error handling, and tool-usage constraints to ensure safe, auditable debugging.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
derHakenderHaken
437

systematic-debugging

Trace data flow and apply a four-phase process to fix root causes.

Community
Advanced
TumeloRamaphosaTumeloRamaphosa

investigate

Investigate software failures through a four-phase evidence-first root-cause workflow.

Community
Advanced
barbosakjnbarbosakjn
1

mcp-builder

Design MCP servers with tool, resource, and prompt contracts.

Community
Advanced
ag47-ptag47-pt
1

systematic-debugging

Guide structured debugging through reproduction, isolation, root cause analysis, and fix verification.

Community
Intermediate