investigation-query

Query investigation logs to retrieve witness statements and identify conflicts.

9.1k|1.8k|Updated Apr 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/claude-for-legal --skill investigation-query-anthropics
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: investigation-query
Source: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-for-legal/tree/main/employment-legal/skills/investigation-query
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/claude-for-legal --skill investigation-query-anthropics

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Investigation logs can be long and hard to search, making it difficult to quickly locate what specific witnesses said, where accounts conflict, and what evidence is strongest for each issue.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Log-based Q&A: Answers questions directly from an open investigation log without forcing you to re-read every entry.
  • Conflict and gaps discovery: Identifies where witness accounts conflict and highlights what information is still missing.
  • Evidence prioritization: Surfaces the strongest evidence tied to each issue, with required log-entry citations.

Quick Start

Use investigation-query by asking a single question about a specific matter, for example: /employment-legal:investigation-query [matter name] Where do the complainant's and respondent's accounts conflict?

Frequently Asked Questions about investigation-query

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I find conflicts in witness statements during an employment investigation?

To find conflicts in witness statements during an employment investigation, query the log directly. The system retrieves targeted entries, highlights where accounts diverge, and maps evidentiary gaps per issue without requiring manual re-reading.

What is the best way to identify evidentiary gaps in an internal investigation log?

The best way to identify evidentiary gaps in an internal investigation log is to query the log for missing information. The system flags what remains unknown per issue, cites log entry IDs, and offers to explicitly state when no relevant information is found.

How do I retrieve what a specific party said in an employment-law investigation without reading the entire log?

To retrieve what a specific party said without reading the entire log, use log-based querying. Ask a single targeted question about the matter to extract relevant witness statements alongside the strongest evidence tied to each issue.

Does the investigation-query process work for employment-law matters requiring cited evidence?

Yes, the investigation-query process works for employment-law matters by requiring cited log entry IDs for all retrieved answers. It ensures attorneys get targeted answers with evidence prioritization while operating in the required query mode.

Can I surface the strongest evidence for each issue from an open investigation log?

You can surface the strongest evidence for each issue from an open investigation log by running targeted queries. The system prioritizes evidence, cites specific log entry IDs, and highlights missing information to support attorney review.