investigation-query

Retrieve attorney answers from investigation logs with cited entry IDs.

Updated May 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/az9713/claude-for-legal-tutorial --skill investigation-query-az9713
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: investigation-query
Source: https://github.com/az9713/claude-for-legal-tutorial/tree/main/employment-legal/skills/investigation-query
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/az9713/claude-for-legal-tutorial --skill investigation-query-az9713

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

investigation-query helps attorneys quickly retrieve relevant facts from an open investigation log without re-reading every entry.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Targeted log questions: Answer questions about what witnesses said, where accounts conflict, what gaps exist, and what strongest evidence supports each issue.
  • Citation discipline: Requires citing investigation log entry IDs in every answer to keep outputs traceable to the record.
  • Gap surfacing: Clearly reports when no relevant information exists and offers to flag the missing topic as a gap.

Quick Start

Ask: /employment-legal:investigation-query [matter name] [your question] to get a citation-backed answer from the investigation log.

Frequently Asked Questions about investigation-query

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I query an investigation log for specific witness statements without reviewing every entry?

Query an investigation log by submitting targeted questions about witness statements, which retrieves precise attorney answers with cited log entry IDs instead of requiring full record review.

What is the best way to identify conflicts and evidence gaps in an employment-law investigation log?

Identify conflicts and evidence gaps by querying the investigation log with specific questions; the system explicitly surfaces missing information as a gap message and references entries reviewed.

How do I ensure investigation log answers are traceable to the original record entries?

Ensure traceability by requiring citation of investigation log entry IDs in every answer, keeping outputs directly linked to the original record entries reviewed.

Can I use this for employment-law investigations to assess evidence strength on specific issues?

Yes, this works for employment-law investigations when attorneys need to query the record for specific issues like evidence strength, witness conflicts, and missing gaps.

What happens when no relevant entries exist for my investigation log query?

When no relevant entries exist, the system returns an explicit gap message referencing the entries reviewed and offers to flag the missing topic as a gap in the investigation.

How do I start querying an investigation log for a specific legal matter?

Start by asking your question with the matter name and specific query about the investigation log, such as witness accounts, conflicts, or evidence supporting each issue.