investigation-query

To find contradictions in witness statements, you can query your investigation logs to identify where parties' statements contradict each other on the same issues. The system extracts what each witness said and flags conflicting accounts for issue-by-issue checks.

The best way to check evidentiary gaps is to query the investigation logs to surface missing evidence and highlight the absence of relevant information. This surfaces missing evidence and highlights the absence of relevant information for your sufficiency assessment.

Yes, you can retrieve what a specific witness said about a particular investigation topic by querying the logs. The system extracts the relevant witness statements and references the specific investigation log entry numbers for easy verification.

To determine which evidence has the highest probative value, query the investigation logs for proof-strength guidance. The system assesses the available evidence and indicates which items carry the highest probative value for each issue under review.

Querying investigation logs requires entries to have identifiable log entry numbers, as responses must reference these numbers for traceability. The system also follows confidentiality handling rules, so logs should be structured for confidential review.

When the investigation log contains no relevant information for your query, the system explicitly states that no relevant information was found. This ensures evidentiary gap analysis is transparent and prevents assumptions during the conflict detection process.