investigation-rules

Automate evidence-backed investigation reporting for debugging and defect analysis.

Updated Jan 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/takemi-ohama/ai-plugins --skill investigation-rules
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: investigation-rules
Source: https://github.com/takemi-ohama/ai-plugins/tree/main/plugins/ndf/skills/investigation-rules
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/takemi-ohama/ai-plugins --skill investigation-rules

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

このルールは、調査・デバッグ・不具合レポート作成時のエビデンス重視の参照と整理を自動的に支援します。否定的結論のエビデンス要件や残課題の記載フォーマット、そしてハルシネーションを抑止するための裏取り原則を提供します。DB調査だけでなくコードベースの調査や仕様調査にも適用可能です。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 否定的結論には必ずエビデンスを添付するルール
  • 残課題の記載フォーマットを標準化
  • 裏取り原則でハルシネーションを防ぐ
  • レポートの品質保証と追跡性の向上

Quick Start

Use the investigation rules to produce a complete, evidence-backed report template for any defect or data anomaly.

Frequently Asked Questions about investigation-rules

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I create an evidence-backed debugging report for a DB investigation?

Use investigation rules to automate evidence-backed reporting for DB investigations and codebase reviews, enforcing structured evidence, traceability, and validation checks throughout your defect analysis.

What is the best way to prevent hallucination in root-cause analysis reports?

Prevent hallucination in root-cause analysis by applying explicit validation checks and cross-referencing principles that require data-backed conclusions and structured evidence for every negative finding.

How do I standardize remaining issues documentation in a defect analysis report?

Standardize remaining issues documentation by applying structured templates that enforce consistent formatting for unresolved questions, data-backed conclusions, and traceable evidence across your investigation.

Can I use this investigation reporting approach for codebase reviews and specifications?

Yes, this approach applies to codebase reviews and specifications, providing structured templates and validation checks to ensure data-backed conclusions and traceable evidence across multiple investigation types.

Why does my debugging report lack traceability for negative conclusions?

Debugging reports lack traceability when negative conclusions are not backed by structured evidence; enforcing explicit templates and validation checks ensures every conclusion includes required supporting data.