investigation-source-trace

Trace claims to their earliest source and reconstruct transmission changes.

212|23|Updated May 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity --skill investigation-source-trace
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: investigation-source-trace
Source: https://github.com/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/tree/main/skills/investigation-source-trace
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity --skill investigation-source-trace

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps you determine where a claim originally came from and whether the version you heard is faithful to the earliest traceable source.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Claim capture and contexting: Rewrites the claim as received, including who asserted it, in what setting, and at what confidence level.
  • Upstream origin tracing: Searches backward for the earliest publication or statement and flags citation laundering.
  • Transmission-chain analysis: Maps how the claim changed over time (scope expansion, caveat stripping, inversion, or fabrication).
  • Credibility assessment and verdict: Evaluates evidence strength, replication, conflicts of interest, and issues a defensible reformulation.

Quick Start

Run investigation-source-trace with the exact statement you heard and any attribution details you have, then choose how deep to go when prompted.

Frequently Asked Questions about investigation-source-trace

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I trace a rumor back to its original source?

To trace a rumor, you capture the exact claim and attribution details, then the tool maps the transmission chain backward to identify the earliest publication, assess source credibility, and output a verdict comparing the original and current meanings.

How does citation laundering affect fact checking?

Citation laundering in fact checking occurs when secondary sources obscure the original claim, stripping caveats or inverting meaning; this tool flags such laundering by reconstructing the transmission chain and comparing the current assertion to the earliest traceable evidence.

What is the best way to verify if a studies show summary matches the underlying source?

Verifying a studies show summary involves upstream origin tracing to locate the original publication, mapping how the claim changed during transmission, and issuing a credibility assessment comparing the summary to the actual evidence and context.

Can I audit media citations without knowing the original authorship?

Yes, you can audit media citations without prior authorship knowledge by inputting the received claim; the tool searches backward for the earliest statement, identifies original authors, and assesses evidence strength to resolve conflicts.

What types of claim mutations can transmission-chain analysis identify?

Transmission-chain analysis identifies scope expansion, caveat stripping, meaning inversion, and fabrication by mapping how a claim changed over time from its earliest traceable source to the current received version.

When should I use source tracing instead of general fact checking?

Use source tracing when resolving conflicts between summarized claims and underlying sources, auditing academic or media citations, or detecting citation laundering, rather than performing simple true or false fact checks.