ios-code-review

Automated code review for iOS Swift identifies quality issues across naming conventions, RxSwift patterns, Clean Architecture, security, UI/UX, and performance. Submit your Swift source files—ViewControllers, ViewModels, UseCases, Repositories—to receive severity-ranked findings (Critical, High, Medium, Low) with concrete fixes and actionable recommendations before merging pull requests.

Yes. RxSwift memory leak detection checks disposal patterns, scheduling, subscription lifecycle, and retain cycles in your Swift codebase. The review flags improper resource management and provides corrected examples to enforce safe reactive patterns across ViewModels and UseCases.

Swift code review checks six core categories: naming conventions, RxSwift patterns, Clean Architecture layering, security vulnerabilities, UI/UX best practices, and performance issues. Each finding includes severity classification, current vs. fixed code examples, and specific guidance for resolution.

Submit PR diffs or specific files to detect Clean Architecture violations, incorrect dependency injection, layer boundary breaches, and structural inconsistencies. The review enforces proper separation between ViewControllers, ViewModels, UseCases, and Repositories with concrete refactoring examples.

Yes. The review validates RxSwift-specific naming conventions, observable composition patterns, subscription management, error handling chains, and operator usage. It flags deviations from idiomatic RxSwift practices and provides corrected patterns aligned with industry standards.

Automated code review provides consistent, repeatable quality checks before merge. Running reviews on all pull requests enforces team-wide adherence to RxSwift patterns, Clean Architecture principles, security standards, and naming conventions without manual overhead, raising baseline quality systematically.