irac

Score law student IRAC case analyses with weighted criteria and feedback.

35|19|Updated May 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/betobetico/claude-para-abogados --skill irac
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: irac
Source: https://github.com/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/tree/main/estudiante-derecho/skills/irac
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/betobetico/claude-para-abogados --skill irac

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Helps a law student evaluate and improve their case analysis by scoring the IRAC structure and delivering specific, actionable feedback without rewriting their work.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • IRAC-Rúbrica evaluativa: scores problem identification, applicable regulation, case application, and conclusion according to weighted criteria.
  • Feedback específico y accionable: points out what is missing, what is incorrect, and where the reasoning needs to be strengthened, while keeping the student’s own writing intact.
  • Corrective learning loop: guides the student on the next steps to reach a higher score and better legal reasoning quality.

Example use case: when you submit an IRAC analysis for a practical legal scenario, you receive a section-by-section score and targeted guidance to revise your argumentation.

Quick Start

Ask: "Evalúa mi IRAC usando la rúbrica: identifica el problema, regula la norma aplicable, aplica al caso y da una conclusión con feedback accionable."

Frequently Asked Questions about irac

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I grade a legal case analysis using the IRAC method?

To grade a legal case analysis using the IRAC method, the Skill evaluates your Issue, Regulation, Application, and Conclusion sections against a weighted rubric, providing per-section scores and targeted feedback without rewriting your original text.

What is the IRAC structure for legal writing?

The IRAC structure for legal writing organizes case analysis into four components: Issue, Regulation, Application, and Conclusion. This Skill uses that framework to score problem identification, applicable rules, case application, and final conclusions.

How do I get actionable feedback on my legal reasoning without rewriting my draft?

You get actionable feedback on your legal reasoning by submitting your IRAC draft for evaluation. The Skill identifies missing elements, incorrect rules, and weak argumentation, guiding you on next steps to improve your score while keeping your writing intact.

Can I use a grading rubric to evaluate a law student's case analysis submission?

Yes, you can use this grading rubric to evaluate a law student's case analysis submission. It applies weighted scoring criteria to the student's IRAC structure and produces specific, corrective learning guidance for improving their legal writing.

Does the IRAC evaluation tool rewrite or correct the student's original legal argumentation?

No, the IRAC evaluation tool does not rewrite or correct the student's original legal argumentation. It strictly provides specific, actionable feedback and per-section scores to guide the student's own revisions and improve their legal reasoning.