irac-practice

To grade your law essay using the IRAC structure, paste your exam prompt and written answer into the skill. It evaluates issue spotting, rule accuracy, analysis depth, and organization, returning structured feedback with a pass, borderline, or not-yet band.

IRAC essay grading feedback assesses legal analysis structure by checking paragraphing, issue spotting, and rule application. The skill grades your draft directly, identifies top fixes, and appends results to a persistent tracker to detect recurring weaknesses across sessions.

Yes, you can grade legal essays without rewriting your draft. The skill evaluates your existing text against an IRAC rubric and provides targeted feedback and ranked fixes, deliberately avoiding rewriting your answer or providing a model answer.

Yes, the IRAC grader supports practice prompts for issue spotting by generating hypothetical scenarios for you to answer. It then evaluates your written response on rule accuracy and analysis application, appending the session outcome to your tracker.

If the IRAC grader is uncertain about a legal rule, it marks the feedback with [UNCERTAIN] or [VERIFY] tags. It also restricts substantive grading when the jurisdiction or legal area is unclear to maintain confidence disciplines.

You should avoid using an automated IRAC essay grader for real-world legal matters. The skill includes safety guardrails that detect real-world facts and escalate toward professional legal help rather than producing substantive advice.